And how wonderful is it that as a society people can disagree.
5 Likes
Sorry, but Bolt is broadcasting to 10 people and a dog over on Sky.
2 Likes
Still has News Corp columns plus an hour(?) a night with Steve Price on 2GB
I donât really agree with most of your comment but holy shit youâre right about Bolt lmfao.
You canât deny heâs said a lot of stupid and idiotic things (just in the past 18 months). From being racist to sexist and in between.
Simply put, if l were a US citizen, I wouldnât want a president who is going to be investigated for raping a child.
If they are true and he is elected, the US would be the laughing stock of the world.
1 Like
With the point that Waleed has very predictable responses to every issue, or with the point that biased media personalities diminish peopleâs trust in news media?
No he is predictable. I dont think he bullies anyone to agree with his views.
1 Like
Many thousands read his column in the paper and read his blog.
1 Like
LOL, I think weâve jumped down enough rabbit-holes about Andrew Bolt for now. I was talking about Waleed Aly, who broadcasts an hour of programming each night to 700,000 people. Someone else mentioned Andrew Bolt. Iâm not interested in discussing Andrew Bolt to be honest.
But yes, there would be many people that read his columns - not even close to the same exposure that Waleed gets on national prime time television each night though. Further, Waleed now has âhousehold-nameâ recognition in Australia. Bolt is generally only known by political obsessives. In fact, in my circle of family and friends, I doubt more than a handful would know of, or give two shits about, Andrew Bolt.
Finally, Bolt was raised as a counter-point to my statement that I find Waleedâs pushing of opinions, no matter the topic, dangerous. Bolt is generally regarded as a nutter for dogmatically pushing certain lines, so Iâm not sure saying âbut what about Bolt?!!â disproves my pointâŚ
https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/785575671309471744
It appeared that Mr. Trump was trying to exert dominance over Mrs. Clinton by standing close and towering over her.âThe proximity to Clinton with which he stood behind her at certain points was particularly threatening,â she said.
Hereâs a perfect (and frankly, hilarious) example of that anti-Trump bias I was referring to from the mainstream media.
Donald was standing at his podium. Hillary decided to walk all the way over to his side of the stage, which in my eyes was an attempt to exert dominance over the stage - and yet Donald is supposedly threatening.
Threatening. Youâve got to be joking. By simply standing at his own podium, with the camera positioning Hillary in the foreground of the shot.
Like, come on. Seriously beneath the New York Times, but of course lapped up by idiots that think politics is a game where anyone you donât like is Hitler.
2 Likes
US Presidential Debate Live on Seven
Thursday 20 October
Seven News will tomorrow broadcast the third and final presidential debate between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in the bitter race to the White House.
Live and commercial-free coverage of the debate begins from midday AEDT on Seven. Live Stream at www.7live.com.au.
Michael Usher will anchor a special Seven News bulletin immediately following the debate, with in-depth analysis and commentary of the final clash from US correspondent Angela Cox in Las Vegas and Chief Reporter Chris Reason, as well as the days other news.
Sydney 12.00pm LIVE on Seven
Melbourne 12.00pm LIVE on Seven
Brisbane 11.00am LIVE on Seven
Adelaide 11.30am LIVE on Seven
Perth 9.00am LIVE on Seven
1 Like
Debate will also be seen on ABC, ABC24, Nine and SBS.
Seven has shown the previous two debates on delay into Perth, so why has it decided to show the third debate live today?
Finally come to their senses
4 Likes
Michael Usher doing a good job.
Karl Stefanovic!? Omg LOL
Meaning�
Well, he isnât known as the most professional or credible ânewsâ anchor 
âBlue tieâ, Julia would be shouting at the television.
1 Like
They showed the last one live as well.