Today (2015-Sept 2020)

Sylvia is back at what she does best- reporting and that is with respect.

Interesting to see what Today would have been like if Deb replaced Georgie.

1 Like

Surely I’m not the only one who wasn’t surprised to hear about this?!

4 Likes

:rolling_eyes: Michael Pell trying to create negative publicity to avoid Today increasing ratings.

1 Like

I saw both a Sunrise and Today promo claiming they were both #1. The sunrise one being on today

3 Likes

I think this is just poor form from Seven. And I hope this gets thrown out

6 Likes

Seven just threatening to sue Nine casts doubt on their win claim and creates uncertainty.

2 Likes

[quote=“Wade, post:858, topic:101, full:true”]
I think this is just poor form from Seven. And I hope this gets thrown out
[/quote] Especially given that since Today are ‘number 1’, Sunrise now all of a sudden adds "Australia’s Number 1’’ to every promo this year.

2 Likes

Once again, even though breakfast / 6pm news has always been measured by ‘weeks won’.

Ch 7 do have a vaild point. Including Olympics, Sunrise are still in front (metro average).

Their better point, which is probably how that hope to win, is that they actually are “Australia’s #1” (metro + regional)… By a long way :wink:

Channel Seven sues Nine over claim Today Show has higher ratings than Sunrise

Channel Seven is suing the Nine Network over claims Nine’s morning program The Today Show has higher ratings than Seven’s competing program, Sunrise.

A statement of claim was filed in the Federal Court on Wednesday afternoon and a hearing is scheduled for Friday.

3 Likes

I’m sure it’s something that Nine didn’t want, yet more legal trouble. They’ve been in plenty lately with the 60 Minutes debacle, the 9Now streaming case against WIN, last year’s The Hot Plate debacle, etc.

Although personally, I find this quite ridiculous. How about improving the quality of Sunrise before worrying about trivial stuff like this Seven?

7 Likes

Too hard basket. :stuck_out_tongue:

2 Likes

Pell spit his diamond encrusted dummy again? Olympics shouldn’t be counted. Its an event that happens every 4 years and it not a true reflection on ratings because people tune into watch the sports and Sunrise is covering them because of the timeslot.

1 Like

My summary as I see it, though we don’t know what the arguments are at this stage.

Nine’s claim to being number one:

Today has won more weeks than Sunrise this year with or without Olympics in the 5-city metro market, to the extent that the show can’t be beaten based on number of weeks won.

While I personally don’t think this a very good measure, it is a claim that has been been made in the past by Seven without dispute and seems to be otherwise well accepted in the industry.

Seven has publicly disputed the number one claim in two ways.

  1. Weeks won is not a proper measure of being number one and that the average audience of a show across the year is the only proper measure. With that argument, neither show could make a claim until the end of the year because it is very close based on average weekly audiences. If Olympics are excluded (as Seven did in 2012 when Nine had the London Olympics), Today is slightly in front; if they are included. Sunrise is slightly in front.

  2. Second claim is based on regional + metro numbers where Sunrise is in front. If you look back at previous program wins by Seven over the years, there are lots of examples where they have claims to be number one solely based on metro numbers, so in this case, they are being inconsistent.

6 Likes

Exactly, let’s call Seven’s actions for what they are: a dummyspit move trying to save face.

You can’t use one form of measurement as the defacto means of winning the ratings, and then trash that same metric the moment you start losing. I mean, you can, because Seven are doing that, but it’s poor form and potentially a PR disaster. Australians hate a whinger.

6 Likes

As noted at week 28 in the Seven v Nine News Ratings topic :

The potential exists for networks after next week to start claiming their news service has “won the year” based on number of weeks of the 40-week survey won. Potential claims from 9 Sydney, 7 Adelaide and 7 Perth plus I wouldn’t be surprised if Seven claimed a national win based on the traditional 6pm result (even though across the hour that isn’t the case).

Seven News at this stage had won 21 weeks at 6pm exactly the same number as Today.

According to this post, the next day Seven started running promos claiming “Australia’s Number 1”

The full post is here:

Really, you can cut the numbers anyway you like

“Australia’s #1” - Well, ALL networks have use the 5 city measure for ratings claims for decades
"Australia’s #1" - Yes, I agree - it should really be national viewership
"Australia’s Most Watched" is a claim I Think Sunrise could make

Then moving on to News

7 or 9 News could claim “Australia’s Number #1” based on just the 6pm news. But what if the claim refers to the actual news service, and then you would like at ratings for Early News, morning shows, morning news, 3pm news, 4pm news and 6pm news"

What if online is factored into the news service “More Australians get their news from 9 News than any other source”

9 News is carried on all SCA stations and 7 News is carried on Prime7/GWN stations - what if someone crunches the numbers and comes up with something different there?

“Victoria’s #1” could be different to "Australia’s #extra

and 7 News could well claim to be “NSW’s most watched news” or “#1” as it airs across Prime7 - where as 9 News doe snot air at all in NNSW - NBN News does.

And then - if you look at ratings - relative to market share - SC News Tas and GWN7 News WA could both claim to be “Australia’s highest rating news”

So really - the point is - you can claim anything you want,

I think the big story is Sunrise has clearly weakened. Today has clearly strengthen. But nationally, Sunrise is still way ahead.
Nine may want to work with it’s SCA and NBN stations to try and increase Today’s ratings in those areas to get the national numbers up. Having some more Newcastle News and perhaps working with SCA stations to offer local news windows or local weather and news tickers could be a good way to do this.

2 Likes

Sure, but if you’re going to sue another network for bragging about being number one, you’ll have to explain why you used that same metric to claim the same feat for every year since 2004!

5 Likes

@pelican

Completely agree with you!

And if “favourite / #1 / most watched” promo and press release claims must refer to national viewership, not just Top 5 markets per Seven’s claim - then they may want to reconsider their Upfront release yesterday:

HOUSE RULES
Australia’s number one renovation show

Then what is “The Block”?

WANTED is Australia’s number one regular drama of 2016

Is that true, can anyone think of a drama that did better? What about Offspring on Ten / SC / WIN?

THE SECRET DAUGHTER is currently the number one drama on Australian television

Looking at Top 5 markets, “Daughter” and “Doctor Doctor” are neck-a-neck. Nine may want to crunch season to date figures nationally.

ratings have NEVER been based on regional figures. Advertising rates are set on 5 cap cities and has always been the standard measurement.

10 Likes

Channel 9 GEM?

2 Likes