Apparently, their popularity has plummeted in the US.
1 Like
Good. Theyâre just vile now. I wish theyâd go away.
3 Likes
I reckon thatâs another bullshit story planted in the media for clickbait.
1 Like
They wonât.
1 Like
Exactly what i thought. The media goes into a frenzy over any baseless story that clickbaiters come up with.
2 Likes
Nobody wants to be associated with King Charles.
Funny how they said that the only ones to accept are Take That without Robbie Williams, the Minogue sisters and Lionel Ritchie. What does an American singer havevto do with the coronation of a British King? 
3 Likes
Yeah and apart from his failed marriage to Diana, i donât really understand why.
He seems like a decent bloke otherwise with a sense of humour.
I know heâs not as popular as QEII was, but i think he at least has a bit more personality than she did. She always seemed a bit staid to me.
2 Likes
I support him
A lot of people think he didnât do a good supporting his youngest son. It has been pointed out that a lot of the artists who donât want to do it are either friends or acquaintances of Harry and are not happy with the way things went down.
2 Likes
WE GET IT. Youâre Team Harry. Good for you. Change the bloody record. I think most people couldnât give a toss either way, to be honest.
1 Like
Thatâs not what Iâm saying. Itâs what is being reported as the reason that the artists are not doing the show. Itâs what theyâre saying behind the scenes.
I get that, but pretty much ALL of your posts are knocking King Charles and the rest of the royals, and pumping up Harry and Meghan. FWIW I donât particularly care about either side. I would probably vote to be rid of the monarchy if it ever came up, but as it stands I am pretty much indifferent. It has no measurable impact on my life, so what does it matter?
You donât have to reply to every post you see.
Itâs not about taking sides. Iâm reporting whatâs in the news. There a lot more scandals involving the royal family than that one.
To perform at a royal event in 2023 would be to align yourself with blatant scandal.
1 Like
Itâs a bit hard and unfair for Charles. Harry is the one fuelling the fire and Charles canât really defend himself or the Royal Family because of his position.
Thereâs always 2 sides to every story and we always only ever really hear Harryâs side.
4 Likes
I think people had a reverence for the Queen (regardless of your monarchy views) for her long âserviceâ and duty to country through times good and bad.
People donât seem to have the same feelings towards Charles. Especially since he canât seem to control his sons - how can he control a monarchy. Probably a good chance to call it a day and become a republic.
4 Likes
I think the King would get a lot of respect if he took a harder public stance against Harry. Copping all these punches like some kind of human punching bag just makes the monarchy seem weak. They would have to get the tone right so they donât come across as bitchy, vengeful or stooping to Harrys level, but it can be done.
A simple one line statement saying he is not welcome to the coronation, citing irreconcilable differences should be enough.
2 Likes
Theyâve already said something along the lines of that they have a different recollection of events, that they are disappointed that he has gone public and left it pretty much at that. Which i think is the right approach.
1 Like
that was in response to the Oprah interview over 2 years ago. I think they can do another short statement and still consider themselves as maintaining a dignified silence.
1 Like
I donât think the premise about being a Republic should be based on feelings about a certain individual - it should be based on the relevance of a monarchy to us and what is best for Australia.
3 Likes