Sydney is ranked 5th in that same survey.
3 Likes
Would be embarrasing if Sydney overtake Melbourne next time too.
Not surprising to be honest (as a Melbournian)
After reaching #7 spot in the equivalent survey last year, I wonder how Perth did this time?
Quite surprisingly, Sydney actually improved considerably on the 2017 results where the city was ranked #11!
Although for many reasons, I personally donât think weâre worthy of being called one of the Top 10 most liveable cities in the world let alone the Top 5.
Itâs even more embarrassing misspelling embarrassing.
5 Likes
Tbh, I associate the unconventional term âlivableâ with ânumber 1â. Just saying. Sydney like any global city would want the mantle.
Iâll add a 
there too.
Housing prices and traffic congestion should be 2 reasons why that DOESNâT happen.
2 Likes
I honestly canât see why Sydney is so highly ranked in this index. The cost of living is numero uno. Congestion is already appalling for a city of Sydneyâs size and itâs getting worse exponentially. The push for comprehensive public transport is too little, too late. Add in a summer climate thatâs becoming wretched and worsening air pollution, too. Vancouver, one notch below Sydney, doesnât suffer from these environmental problems as much.
These quality of life issues become more pronounced the further west you go. If one limits the analysis to the inner suburbs where the transport options are plentiful and the climate and air quality are more pleasant, the ranking might be justified.
Canberra is probably Australiaâs most liveable city, and Iâd rank every city in NZ above Sydney and Melbourne, too.
4 Likes
And Melbourne doesnât have chronic gridlock and insanely poor affordability as well??
Not as bad as Sydney though.
Do you think so? London is 48th on the list , New York 57th but are both regarded as global giants.
But isnât a high cost of living an indicator of high demand which in turn points to high liveability (or at least, perceived liveability)? Especially in a country like Australia where land is abundant.
Just a thought. But these rankings are totally pointless anyway, a better approach would be to categorise cities (ie good, average, bad) but that wouldnât create headlines or generate clicks.
1 Like
The concentration of work and human capital in cities has pushed people to migrate from rural areas to urban areas, which in turn puts pressure on house prices and filters through to other prices. This is true for every city in the world; Sydneyâs cost of living relative to other cities in the region is high. Moreover, population doesnât guarantee that a city will provide a good quality of life- think Mumbai or Beijing! But as a city grows, it should make the life of its citizens as good as possible to keep them there!
Thereâs the small matter of water resources in arid and semi-arid climates to consider here.
1 Like
This appeared on The Weekly tonight, as part of the segment called âGo Awayâ, which is a parody of Getaway.
PLEASE NOTE: What Tom Gleeson says here should not be taken too seriously.
3 Likes
Glad to see the boffins agree with some of what I said above:
Both Sydney and Melbourne got full points in the âinfrastructureâ categoryâŚ
While this may be true for inner-city residents, our research has found that some suburbs â particularly those on the urban fringe â are less lucky. Public transport in particular is often missing in outer suburbs. The index doesnât consider how liveability is distributed across a city and if some people are missing out.
1 Like
Have they seen Sydney, or NSW, public transport, as a whole? It makes Australiaâs media industry sound like a responsible citizen and a powerhouse! 
1 Like
1 Like
I reckon living in Point Piper or Toorak would be rather lovely.
2 Likes
Hot Europeans visit bondi beach, so Sydney. 
You wonât find many expats living in Point Piper, far too expensive.
1 Like