The supers. The red bug is inspired by the CBS News sizzle reel; they’d use the standard blue one for breaking news in real life, but I think this suits the nature of the news more.
And a very long stretch (time wise) to the original US Mornings: Rebranding Jeremy Vine’s show as 5 News Mornings. As his show uses a flipper to reveal social links, I used the one in CBS News instead.
I agree although I would’ve lent more towards the CBS Evening News look rather than the CBS Local O&O look myself as it would align better IMO. Channel 5 doesn’t do local news broadcasts so aligning it with CBS Local doesn’t quite work. Maybe if Paramount bought a local-tv service like London Live or adopted an ITV-style approach to regional news on Channel 5 this look would suit.
Great work though!
The amount of polish and attention to detail in this mock is impressive, looks as if they were real caps!
Despite the chunky Nine logo likely to suffer from loss of details at smaller sizes for digital uses, it’d be interesting to see it make a return, it’s certainly very dominant compared to the current iteration.
when nine last had the olympics they had something similar to my concepts and didn’t use the wwos logo though that would make sense as it is their sports brand.
That is true however when you think about the lead-up to the 2012 games Nine used ‘the globe’ logo together with the Olympic Rings on WWOS broadcasts. The Nine logo was only really used during coverage of the games itself.
I wasn’t suggesting it would ‘fit’ today. I was simply saying that the 1990’s type globe style would be better suited to this application in a co-branding sense as it would return an iconic piece of the Wide World Of Sports brand. If Nine follow the same strategy with a joint Nine/Stan Sport brand like they currently do with events they will need to have branding that shows this which can only mean the globe|Stan Sport branding would need to continue.
yes but I think there is a requirement from the IOC that they have to have the rings in the watermark. would look very long if the rings were added. will see what happens
The channel had branded itself as “TV2 South Pacific Television” since its launch (30 June 1975), according to sources. In 1976, it dropped the TV2 moniker and was renamed simply South Pacific Television before merging with TV One (now TVNZ 1) to form TVNZ in 1980. This also reduced confusion in Auckland and Dunedin where TV One broadcast on channel 2 (TV2 broadcast on channel 4 in both centres).
Additionally, the iconic TV2 logo from the old TVNZ era was used from 1982 to mid-1987.
The mock production endcap is identical to the one used, in real life, by Australia’s Nine Network during the early to mid 1990s.
It would’ve been fine if Channel i was a niche entertainment channel; it didn’t, as it was Channel 5’s only TV rival at the time in terms of general entertainment.
Having 5 and Channel i under common ownership (not gonna go technical, given SG’s small territorial space) would’ve meant programming changes to avoid any duplication. Channel U was kept on the air after the buyout, because…Chinese majority demo, and made it a channel for Asian dramas with Mandarin audio dub.
I cannot comment much on Mediacorp’s news output domestically, but I guess logistics and CNA might be the reasons News Tonight doesn’t rebroadcast late night on linear TV. If Channel i was kept, in my view, a News Tonight rebroadcast won’t be necessary.
