2HD wants 90.5 translator into Belmont North
https://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/changes-to-the-newcastle-lap
2HD wants 90.5 translator into Belmont North
https://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/changes-to-the-newcastle-lap
Emboldened by their Toowoomba success the Bill and Al caravan of quasi conversion rolls into Australiaās seventh largest market.
Under ACMAās heading Discussion of proposal, the reasons given are all very similar to what has happened surrounding most urban AM sites.
Applying this logic, why did 4BC go to considerable expense to shift sites and to a less favourable site. No FM infill. ACMA was quite clear none would be offered.
Homebush Bay sites have development within the drop zone of AM masts. Significant absorption of ground wave.
ACMA imply modifications to the existing site are impractical or wonāt resolve the coverage deficiencies. On what grounds? Install TX capable of an appropriate power increase during the day, review what is required at night.
Appendix A
The map is curious. Both the CRC and ITU predictions show coverage stops well before the 2.5 mV/m contour and thereās more of the licence area to go, including plenty of highway coverage missed on the F3.
Appendix C
In other directions, looking at outlying towns; Buladelah, Dungog, Singleton, Paxton and valleys of the Hunter in between, coverage must not be too good in those locations either. Urban noise within towns and surrounding industry, over 100km of highway and byway coverage missed too, esp at night.
Other thoughts
This proposal needs to find a different allocation that is not a Sydney sub metro allocation. ACMAās suggestion of an advisory note that itāll be interference limited to 60 dBμV/m. Find a clear channel, postpone this until the whole region is reallocated.
If 2HD need infill here, theyāll need one later for the F3 region I described plus the other areas. Port Stephens already on air. Very inefficient use of spectrum.
Beyond the scope
Market priced FM conversion cost. Old NBN 3 audio carrier and clear the rest either side.
Create a mechanism of recent sale multiples commensurate to market size, market revenue or actual comparable station revenue. Choose one or all objects. Open process. No excuses of ācommercial in confidenceā to hide behind. Good luck with the latter.
I wonder if the Central Coast stations would have concerns with this proposal as the area in question lays very close to where the Gosford LAP boundary is.
90.5 is somewhat coincidental as there is still a pirate on that frequency here.
I am 5km from the Belmont North TX site with a perfect LOS, so I will be interested to see how this goes, if implemented.
It will also mean an end of any Dx reception of Alive 90.5 from Parramatta during tropo.
Thatās covered in the explanatory document, it uses the precedent that Rob Gamble and co achieved with their reasoning for changes to 96.1 Gympie, (the ones they didnāt go through with).
Overspill is expected if it means it covers within the area.
The prediction maps show only small overspill into Gosfordās licence area, thereās a lot more remaining of the Newcastle area below the 2.5 mV/m contour that receive no benefit from this proposal. In theory.
We all know that Caralis translators seem to have special qualities of far exceeding the predictions.
Iām surprised thereās not more discussion about this proposal. What do people think? Will it get up? Will SCA oppose it as in Toowoomba?
Yes, itās plausible that it could constitute a quasi FM conversion for 2HD in the Lake Macquarie area.
Re Overspill, I donāt think 90.5 would cause anymore overspill into the Gosford area than the Mt Sugarloaf stations do, which have strong coverage down to Forresters Beach and just north of Wyong on the Old Pacific Highway.
Conversely Gosford stations overspill into the east side of Lake Macquarie to a similar level.
I canāt get the ACMA Radcom database to load, maintenance?
Many of the supposed āproblemsā are not what they seem.
Thereās a mention of a 1.8km freeway through the TX site. ACMA notes the licensee gave list of examples of development in the past decade. This is one of four points.
This is not true, no land was resumed for the long overdue Newcastle inner city bypass extension. There is an AM TX site due west of the project that is untouched, I watched the āmovieā of Nearmap aerial images from 2010 to present and that site was not disturbed.
āNo radials were harmed in the making of this roadā
Hmm, I think I might put in a submission against this.
Whilst Iām all for making radio reception better, I think this will more benefit BOG rather than the listener, & itāll just clog up the FM band more.
I donāt think itās what it seems, & if they do what they should, & replace the ground radials around the mast that has deteriorated (not due to the highway passing through the site either), then theyād be in a better situation.
If they get this up, ACMA should also grant translators at the same site, for similar reasons for the ABC AM services & SBS AM.
The thing is though, around the Belmont North, Floraville, Jewels area, where this would serve the greatest, the FMās from Mt Sugarloaf are far more difficult to receive, than the Newcastle AM services including 2HD.
The DTV translator at this proposed site was installed due to poor reception from Mt Sugarloaf, the FMās are in the same boat as TV, so they should get a translator here too.
I drive Belmont to Sydney every day, & can say that while 2HD is reasonably poor from Blacksmiths, & South, it is receivable to a listenable standard all the way to Sydney, & even receivable in parts of Sydney during the daytime, because the deteriorated radials let the signal āfloatā over the local licence area, & land further afield.
When Iām traveling pre-dawn, 2HD gets hammered moderately by 4HI Emerald, from around Belmont South, but this is negated as I travel further South, & 2HD comes good again around the Sparks Rd interchange on the M1 (F3), which is outside the Newcastle licence area, & about where the Newcastle FMās start to drift into obscurity.
The Port Stephens FM translator is easily received at the 2HD studios at Sandgate & up into Maitland, itās also receivable in & around Newcastle city, this Southern translator would cover the Southern half of the RA1 area, meeting the Southern edge of the PS translator, giving 2HD a full coverage quasi FM service around Newcastle.
The Upper Hunter could do with more FM stations. Maybe Bill should be told to f**k off.
Exactly my thoughts.
Yes, knew the bypass construction made no difference.
What we have here is the typical commercial AM site in 2018: underinvestment.
Youāve seen guy ropes become poorly maintained and damage masts in Wagga and Gordonvale plus many other sites which have not had their opex budgets looked after sensibly.
Iāve noticed the same problems with 2HDās coverage, it is all about underinvestment in the site.
You donāt have to be a retired or now dead guru of AM site engineering, simply commonsense and a suitable budget.
Guys regarding the 2HD submission, I need (would like) to find how long ago I posted in Media Spy about information I had received, about 2HD doing field signal strength tests, & them coming back weaker than past tests, with it being discovered the 1143KHz Earth mat had deteriorated, & that was causing the lower power output radiation levels from the mast/antenna?
It wouldāve been in the old forums site, somewhere between mid year 2010 & mid year 2013?
Iāve tried a few archive sites, but canāt find it.
Would anyone happen to recall, is it etched in your memory, or anyone know an archive site that might have all posts archived for that period?
These signal/reception issues have been going on at 2HD for quite sometime now, & the station have known about the problem & cause, now theyāre trying to make out issues are only recent & blaming unrelated things for it, I want to call them out on the BS.
Which ones so we can try alternatives?
I do remember the discussion, reduced efficiency.
Iāve tried, archive.org, & pandora.nla.gov.au
They have some MediaSpy pages archived, but not all & unfortunately not the ones I want.
Donāt know if this would count as Newcastle Radio or not because I heard this on Power FM from Muswellbrook. Their Saturday afternoon programming must be pre recorded because I heard the presenter mention that they were giving away tickets to the upcoming Knights vs Roosters Voice for Mining day then went on to mention that that evening the Knights were taking on the Eels and mentioned he was a Parramatta supporter.
One problem. Sounded like they mustāve used the recording from last week cause it was like a time warp back to the prevous Saturday
Doesnāt surprise me that itās prerecorded but youād think it would have been done a day or two before and that they would have scheduled the current/correct recording.
Itās a horrid station anyway, but I thought theyād at least proof read everything.
Have the novoās changed their line up again?
Sophie Tiller leave?
Sophie was sacked about a month ago.
Only lasted a few months then?
Hilarious! Sophie was sacked!?!?! From a Caralis station!
What for?
Well done for listening, did you find the station by accident? I see zero marketing of the station which considering, I guess is a good thing.