People won’t travel less, they’ll turn to driving themselves or ridesharing. I’m not sure that a further restricted lockdown is the best idea but it would sure stop a large number of people from moving about.
Consequently, if workplaces are to remain open, you want increased frequency in order to allow people to better social distance.
I’m meant to be moving home on Thursday next week so no doubt this will impact. I hope you are confident in your source as you have just made my anxiety levels rise so I’d hate for this to be out there and not correct.
I can’t seem to find one bit of this anywhere else at the moment (and most of what I read daily has been correct so far), so I’m in some way hopeful this source is incorrect for now.
The problem is that heavy measures only impact the short term. That’s why I think we need measures that are longer lasting in areas that have had higher transmission. We need to think long term. When we come out the other side environments that had high transmissions (such as particular workplaces/industries) should have to maintain heavy restrictions longer term (such as on number of people able to work at a time or whatever other measures are put in place). Then other areas that havn’t had huge outbreaks and seem lower risk environments can cautiously move forward - whether it be just starting with 2 visitors to homes at first, and then restaurants/gyms with socially distanced measures etc.
Very vocal around the unknown community transmissions that are active but don’t know it, spreading the virus further. Clearly hundreds or thousands out there that we don’t know about. It would be interesting to see what areas these are in, I assume the west.
There is only one way to stamp that out and sadly that a full shutdown of specific areas. People won’t be able to travel across suburbs if it’s going to be specific.
Everything reported were based off rumours already circulating. You got masks right but got 5km radius of travel wrong and got a stage 4 restriction announcement wrong. How’s that strike rate? I just don’t think anyone (or media outlet) taking a stab off nothing but rumours just to try and get in 30 mins before a press conference is helpful to anyone.
Dan is pretty transparent that they are considering other options but clearly they haven’t settled on anything yet.
This is a good article which gives some breakdown of the current status, which should give light into local area closures. Or stamp out the spotfires as Dan claimed.
So why even come out with it? Just spreading fear and division. Journalists once reported facts, they didn’t make the story about themselves and spread potentially dangerous misinformation to a community who is living in the middle of a deadly pandemic.
Of course you’re not the only one, the professionals are doing it too, the playing on people’s emotions is becoming tiresome.