Don’t know if this might be better posted elsewhere (mods please move as you see fit) but one of the people who died in the Wellington hostel fire last month was Liam Hockings, brother of BBC World News presenter Lucy Hockings.
Exactly, sitting at home on gardening leave sounds nice for a while, but they might wanna go work for Sky or GB, and the longer they’re off air the easier they are to forget.
To paint this as being “because they are women” is appalling in itself. If they were men they would also be out of work still.
Is very strange they are hiring freelancers and acting-up reporters when they have presenters on the bench? Unless they get paid more if they actually work (appearance fee) although that would be unlikely.
Still cannot see the equation of this situation with “appalling treatment” when still drawing money from the company. Depending on their contracts, they may or may not be able to cease their employment (notice period most likely required) and try the free market if they are so appalled.
It’s a waste of public money. These presenters are still drawing a full salary, paid for by the license fee, which all Brits who own a TV are required to pay. Yet the BBC has chosen to pay even more money to have a load of casuals do these fill in shifts instead. Common sense would surely dictate that the five presenters on the bench could do these shifts. It sounds like there is some aversion to putting on air anyone associated with the old news channel.