As part of the move, the existing ITN Archive channel will be rebranded as Frontline by ITN, sitting alongside two newly created channels: Flashback by ITN and ReâTold by ITN.
Frontline by ITN will focus on conflict and global affairs, offering curated, contextualised archive footage from some of the most significant moments in modern history. It will also be the first channel produced by ITN to introduce YouTube Memberships, âgiving users the opportunity to directly support the digitisation and preservation of ITNâs archive, while helping to shape future releases of content.â
Flashback by ITN will celebrate defining moments from popular culture, while ReâTold by ITN will present a snapshot in time of our collective social history. Using these new genre âbucketsâ, the digital team will âexperiment with formats that utilise the best of the archive for a digital-first audience.â
Alongside the archive channels, the team has also refreshed the existing YouTube channels â The Royal Family Channel, Onlooker (formerly ODN) and Pop Drop (formerly ODE).
The two will launch YouTube channels for Arthur, the long-running animated series produced by GBH, and Jacques Pépin, whose programme Jacques Pépin Cooking at Home was produced by KQED.
The Arthur YouTube channel will be available worldwide excluding the US, while the Jacques Pépin channel will be available around the globe.
The two are also launching YouTube channels for Peep & the Big Wide World, produced by GBH (worldwide excluding Canada) and Piripenguins, produced by Eaglet Films and Red Monk Studio for BBC and Rai, which will be available in North America.
Billy Bones Club ad breaches Ad Standards rules by promoting smoking
Ad Standards has upheld a complaint against fashion retailer Billy Bones Club over a YouTube ad depicting people smoking and drinking.
Although Ad Standards only received the complaint in recent months, Billy Bones Club first posted the ad to Youtube seven years ago.
The report added: âThe Panel considered that the community at large has moved away from the notion that smoking is considered appealing or essential to oneâs image.â
https://www.brickfanatics.com/lego-live-series-for-england-world-cup
Presenter Manny Brown will host the livestreams from 6pm to 7pm on June 17, 23 and 27. He will be joined by a different guest for each episode, including former England sprinter and television personality Harry Aikines-Aryeetey, content creator Harry Pinero and England Lioness Lauren Hemp MBE.
Times are in BST (nine hours behind AEST).
A few days ago, I received a copyright strike for a Channel Ten video I uploaded over five years ago. However, when I looked into it more, I noticed that the copyright strike wasnât from Channel Ten; it was sent by a video restoration company called Australian Television Archive.
So basically, it was a fraudulent copyright strike sent by someone who doesnât even own the rights to the content in the video.
Iâve never been in a situation like this in the 13 years that I have had my channel.
He also sent a fraudulent copyright strike to @Zampakid on the same day and for a video similar to the one that I had taken down. I know thereâs a lot of us here who uploads TV content onto YouTube, so I just wanted to warn everyone in case he starts to send out copyright strikes to other channels.
Thatâs how smart the AI police are, and they canât stop the buying, selling and content theft of channels ![]()
Iâm pretty sure the guy who runs this company is on this forum? Surely (hopefully) a mistake?
Edit: @austvarchive but he hasnât been on since November.
Probably trying to make everyone go through them and pay if they want archive tv footage
Try doing the same thing back.
Odysee is a better place for video archiving
I donât really want it to become a âtit for tatâ type of situation, tbh.
As much as I am annoyed over what has happened, I also donât want to stoop down to that level by sending fraudulent copyright strikes, especially seeing as though I legally donât own the rights to the content I upload anyway.
Eh I tried Odysee.. it was weird to figure out
Gave up & returned to YouTube.
Eh.. The only copyright issues Iâve had were all related to intro music
Like.. itâs annoying when the artist says âCopyright Free Musicâ and you end up gettinga strike anyway.
Had to trim parts out of a Channel 9 continuity yesterday
They said the issue was âNRL Contentâ⊠but the part which was striked was a Medicare ad.
Iâve been a YouTuber since 2017 and itâs been a lot of fun.
The current format for the YouTube Channels started in 2018.
I canât comment specifically on this one but it reminds me of that time a few years back when I uploaded to YouTube a compilation of radio news intros sourced from many sources, and credited accordingly. There are plenty of similar videos on YouTube that source and credit and that is the correct way to do it. But for the former Radio Vault YouTube channel, that wasnât good enough and they claimed I had stolen their content. All the Radio Vault did was digitise and upload the content. That was it. They donât own the copyright or intellectual property, the respective broadcasters did. Merely digitising and uploading does not give an individual the right to claim that itâs theirs and thatâs the view I have taken all along. Iâve digitised and uploaded videos of TV broadcasts before and those have been re-uploaded to YouTube and elsewhere and I didnât care, because it wasnât my content.
On a side note, the Radio Vault later set up a paid model for access which lasted less than a day because you canât charge people for content that is not yours.
