Promos:
5 Likes
Their original promos which have more logos.
They obviously aren’t allowed advertise some shows yet. Like South Park, they show clips but didnt mention it by name. In fact it’s only mentioned in one Promo i believe.
What’s the source? A random YouTube channel? That doesn’t look offical…
3 Likes
WIN would have contracts in place
Ironic post of the year contender.
8 Likes
As i said use google.
In the same time of you looking for source and awaiting a reply you would’ve found your answer. And in my post above i clearly say in Shakes original promos.
ffs… i wish that the affiliation swap of july 2016 never happened!
1 Like
Google is not a source. Google is a search engine.
3 Likes
Which leads you to find the sources yourself.
I’m so sorry for doubting you. You’re totally right, how could I not consider this very official, very legitimate source?
11 Likes
Hooray you did your research
I highly doubt WIN will end up carrying 10 Shake
I wish we could just use american-style affiliation.
What would tv be like then if that was in place?
(hypothectical)
10 Shake would basically not exist under a US system.
The networks there do not have multi channels.
The US does have digital multi channels owned by various companies (sometimes the networks) but they are not branded as an off shoot of the network. Also they are extremely 3rd 4th 5th tier. Pretty much no one knows they exist or watches them. They are not counted in the network ratings. And they are often full of Terrible programming.
Affiliates carry them, on a station by station basis.
And in a market as small as say Tamworth or Cairns you wouldn’t get 1/10th Of the digital channels that a larger market like Brisbane has
The larger tv markets have about a dozen or these multi channels. The small markets have almost none.
1 Like
Sorry. I didnt know that
IIRC that was similar to one of the alternative proposals that broadcasters put forward in the lead up to aggregation. The markets would’ve resembled the solus monopolies in SA and Griffith.
Each of the seven local sub-areas in Queensland, for example, would be their own separate station. The main station would carry the affiliation of one network and they would also broadcast the other two networks in that area. Before aggregation, the regional stations had already started associating with each other for programming and advertising purposes if not merging completely. If US-style aggregation has happened we would still see regional networks forming but they’d look less rigid than the ones we have now.
Two examples from the early 80s before aggregation was announced would be the Great Eastland Television network which was an association between Northern Rivers TV (owned Coffs and Lismore), Darling Downs TV (owned Toowoomba and Darling Downs) and TV New England (owned Tarree and Tamworth); or SIX Network which owned Shepparton, Ballarat, Launceston and Mount Gambier.
1 Like
WIN Peach Newcastle played a 10 SHAKE ad about 10 minutes ago. Is that normal for them?
Long promo
4 Likes
A little underwhelmed by these promos tbh, there’s not much excitement in them.
The whole package for the channel also looks a little boring and safe.