BBC News/World News

Steve Lai has made his presenting debut from the London studio - he usually presents Newsday from Singapore

5 Likes

Huw Edwards charged just over 12 months after he was suspended

2 Likes

another (alleged) nonce at the BBC. colour me shocked

Letā€™s not go all GB News here. Over 21,000 people are employed by the BBC.

3 Likes

My question would be why did they pay him - and give him a raise - for the last 12 months when heā€™s been off the air due to all this

Standard procedure. Apparently not even the BBC knew what was going on.

1 Like

The scandal is over a. year old.

We knew 12 months ago he has been sexting with a minor and came off air almost immediatly. He then got paid for the last 12 months

Couple of things - and trying to tread very carefully, for obvious reasons:

a) The minor thing was only ever alleged, by the Sun newspaper. The Met Police said at the time that no criminal offences had been committed. Obviously Iā€™m not saying that makes it right morally, but the Met were very clear that at that point, there was nothing to investigate.

b) Itā€™s not clear - and probably wonā€™t be, for obvious reasons - if the images Huw has been arrested for, are of the same person whose family kicked off the initial scandal. Going by the above, it sounds like it isnā€™t. All we know is that Huw has been arrested for sharing CSAM in a WhatsApp chat. Thatā€™s it.

(Again, I know we have to be extremely careful when discussing cases like this, so mods, please feel free to delete anything Iā€™ve written if you need to, or let us know if thereā€™s anything we can or canā€™t say)

2 Likes

The key thing to remember is that these are only allegations, he hasnā€™t been put on trial in a impartial court yet. At the time the police said that they did not have reason to investigate further. Obviously either this is a separate thing, or further evidence has come to light.

Not defending Huw, just defending the system of innocent before guilty.

2 Likes

Yep, got all that. But if youā€™ve been accused of inappropriate behaviour with a minor and youā€™re removed from hosting role on the air due to the nature of the allegations - and you are not working - you should not be getting paid.

especially on the tax payer dime

A newsreader is meant to be the beacon of trust.

1 Like

Again, itā€™s innocent until proven guilty. The BBC had to keep him on the payroll until their own investigation was completed, otherwise he could potentially have had grounds to sue for unfair dismissal. The Met said at the time of the initial scandal that there was nothing to investigate.

Obviously now - and I canā€™t believe Iā€™m quoting The Big Lebowski here - new shit has come to light.

2 Likes

If they sacked him without actually having proof, then it would be grounds for unfair dismissal.

1 Like

Iā€™m no lawyer - but surely having the trust of the nation is a major prerequsite of the job. If you donā€™t have that - you donā€™t qualify for the job - surely.

Iā€™m not entirely famililar with UK employment law - but if I was accused of the same things he was - I have a client / business facing role here with my job in the UK - if I was accused of the same thing and it was detrimental for my company and their image / brand - Im sure Iā€™d be off the payroll pretty quick.

Surely BBC could argue (with good lawyers) he brought tarnish and bad reputation to the corporation?

2 Likes

Itā€™s a fair point. And Iā€™m not a lawyer either. Iā€™m just trying to make sense of why the BBC acted how they did, at the (yes, probably glacial) pace they did.

They could - but the thing is, if he could prove he didnā€™t do it, then they had no reason to dismiss him. Apologies if anything I say is wrong, I am a law student, but only first year.

Conversely, is it cheaper for the BBC to keep a presenter off-air than it is to defend a wrongful termination lawsuit?

Not saying I agree or disagree, but just because an employer has a clause in their contracts about ā€˜bringing the organisation into disreputeā€™ (for example; we donā€™t actually know if the BBC does, but letā€™s assume they do) doesnā€™t mean it is practically enforceable.

2 Likes

Last yearā€™s story is very different to the allegations reported this week. The police said last year no criminal offence took place.

Unlikely. You would be suspended while the usual investigation takes place. UK and Australian employment law is very different to that of the US. Everyone is entitled to procedural fairness and the right to return if the investigation found you did nothing wrong.

Given Huwā€™s profile and the salary he was on, he could bring a huge lawsuit for lost earnings and reputational damage if he was found to be sacked without cause or unfairly. The money the BBC paid him while on suspension would not have even covered the BBCā€™s legal fees let alone compo.

Until this weekā€™s allegations, no crime seemingly took place as the Sun backtracked their story very quickly and the cops publicly said no crime was committed. Whether itā€™s inappropriate is another matter.

4 Likes

Ok, fair enough to many points you raise. I do get legally itā€™s a minefield.

That said, you donā€™t have to commit a crime to be terminated.

You can be terminated for not doing your job well, or other reasons.

A whole bunch of 7 News employees were just terminated. People in media both on air and off air are terminated for a variety of reasons every day.

Perhaps bbc should have had it his contract or any on air news talent or jour that if they are involved in any sort of public scandal that brings disrepute to the news organisation or challenges the trust the public puts in news anchors and journalists- then bbc has the right to claw back any money.

The guy was on sick leave from stress for 9 months. Most uk contracts give sick days - maybe 10-20 - but not 9 months worth. People have income insurance protection to cover that. So Iā€™m not sure how he can be on sick leave and get paid almost $1.5 million.

Also he resigned in April. So once you resign you should defi not be getting paid.

BBC needs better contracts to protect the tax payers pound and make public figures accountable. Now that heā€™s been charged for a crime - and he was off work ā€œsickā€ for 9 months - hopefully bbc lawyers can claw back that money

Heā€™s plead guilty

Update: Huw Edwards has pleaded guilty

2 Likes