Paramount is only interested in what makes them the most money.
Am I right in saying that CNN now will shift rightward ala CBS News?
Only thing of value at 10
In terms of the legalities, surely WBD have demanded a whole bunch of sweetener clauses in the merger, the mountain of IPs and copyrights too, there is serious legacy there, itâd be disastrous to vaporise the Warners name. Obviously Paramount will be the main player here and should have the control, not disputing that.
Like Disney kept the Fox label and its legacy and very much active as a subsidiary.
Iâll note as one random observation for example, Disney still use the ÂŠď¸ 20th Century Studios line (rather than ÂŠď¸ Disney) for new ex-Fox IP releases, etc. So there must be historical contractual things there, otherwise theyâd have it owned under their name, why wouldnât they.
Yes. Trump has allegedly even asked David Ellison to fire certain hosts he doesnât like (Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar).
Clearly there will be some intervention from the right and there will be a reckoning but theyâll soon discover they canât outfox Fox. Trump just continues this personal retribution because someone hurt his feelings but the republicans are the party of free speech. Fuckwits. The Ellisons are pretty much fuckwits too. Hope they donât ruin the once great legacy film companies.
Letâs just hope theyâll find theyâve bitten off more than they can chew. Fuckwits. I agree with you entirely.
Iâll be interested to see what paramount do with TNT sports in the UK and if they gobble up the rights for P+. Thereâs a lot of moving parts here. I would like to see some considerable consolidation of all the cable networks. Theyâre basically shit. They donât need that many.
in the IT world, the Ellisons are hated, and Oracle has this funny little acronym the community has made
ORACLE -
One
Rich
Asshole
Called
Larry
Ellison
One interesting aspect is Paramount+ is meant to take over from TNT Sports as the main Champions League rights holder from the 2027/28 season. If the WBD/Paramount merger does happen, perhaps TNT Sport might still be able to show the Champions League after all.
I doubt it. WBD want to be sold, this isnât a merger or hostile takeover (well, sort of not) - the WB studios might remain for a few years but I suspect theyâll be folded in in time. You donât talk about synergies then plan to run different arms.
Late Thursday night at around 10.30p.m. in London at the world premiere afterparty for Warner Bros.â all-star gothic romance âThe Bride!,â phones suddenly began pinging simultaneously across the room.
The news had broken: Netflix had pulled out of the deal to acquire Warner Bros. Discovery, leaving Paramount Skydance poised to claim victory.
Guests noted a palpable sense of relief â a feeling that Hollywoodâs most intensely fought contest in years was finally over.
Iâm not sure HBO Max and Paramount + will merge
The HBO brand is iconic and worth so much. Itâs been around 52 years. Itâs got significant value.
Para is paying US$111 billion for the content. Theyâre not going to put all that on Paramount+ for free / the same price.
Maying buying up to HBO Max as a tile inside Paramount+ for another $15 a month
they need to keep that content monetised
Iâm dubious itâll get through state AGâs and Europe, but if it does, I assume theyâll do a HBO addition like you suggest. Theyâd be crazy to kill that IP. They did with Showtime, but arguably there wasnât much left of that, though I still think itâd be a better name than P+.
There is no way anyone is gonna get all the hbo content for the same price as youâre getting the para content. Prices will double. They need to pay for the $111m somehow. And hbo / wb is premium content. You donât give that away
P+ basic then an add on for no ads, an add on for UFC, an add on for HBO. Itâll end up like a cable thing.
I suspect the only way Paramount gets the scale of customers they need to make this work is to merge the two services. Maybe thereâs an HBO add on but Ellison seems dead set on swallowing it up.
Youâre not gonna give away $111b of content for free when you can sell it for $20 a month.
10s of millions of households already happily pay for both.
This is about power as much as money. I take your point but I think that would be the only way they can scale up vs Netflix