The Jury

The unmissable true crime event, The Jury: Death on the Staircase, premieres Wednesday 6 November on SBS and SBS On Demand

The unmissable landmark true crime event The Jury: Death on the Staircase will have you on the edge of your seat – is truth and justice simply a matter of perspective?

Follow a real case, re-enacted from real court transcripts, in front of a new jury of 12 everyday Australians.

Premieres Wednesday 6 November at 8.30pm on SBS and SBS On Demand

What would you do if someone’s life was in your hands? In an Australian first, SBS Original The Jury: Death on the Staircase takes inspiration from a smash-hit format from Channel 4 in the UK to provide insight and analysis on how juries work. Trial by jury has been described as one of the most ‘venerated and venerable’ aspects of our justice system[i], but is it? The gripping documentary event airs Wednesdays from 6 November at 8.30pm on SBS and SBS On Demand.

Over five unmissable episodes, the series re-enacts a real manslaughter trial* with actors reciting real court transcripts word-for-word. But just as in a real court, the new jury is made up of 12 everyday Australians. The jurors reflect contemporary Australian society – a diverse range of ages, cultures, and life experiences. Will they conclude the accused is an innocent man, or determine he is guilty? Will the new jury arrive at the same decision as the original trial?

We know very little about juries. They are, by law, secret and sacrosanct – until now. There are strident critics who argue jurors are all too often prejudiced, ignorant and inexperienced at their task. The Resolve Political Monitor survey, as reported by the Sydney Morning Herald on 30 July 2024, revealed only 30 per cent of Australians have faith in the country’s courts[ii] and justice system in which juries play a crucial role. How will our jurors use or overcome their own biases, prejudices, and life experience to judge another person’s actions?

The Jury: Death on the Staircase goes behind the scenes of the jury room where cameras and recording devices are normally strictly prohibited, to witness how a cohort of 12 strangers interpret confounding evidence, how they judge the motives and expertise of witnesses, and decode the ingenuity of defence and prosecution tactics.

The series reveals the secrets, challenges, missteps, and wisdom that transpires when ‘the people’ judge ‘the people’. It also exposes the laws and traditions of the court, encouraging the audience to reflect on all it does right, and where the scales of justice might be skewed.

After persuasive closing arguments, we follow our 12 jurors through an emotionally charged deliberation. Can the jurors work together? Will they arrive at a unanimous decision?

**SBS Commissioning Editor, Bethan Arwel-Lewis said: “**We’re so excited about this fascinating and ground-breaking series. It’s SBS’s role to create programs that drive national conversation around important issues, and the series absolutely does this, but as a gripping true crime TV event. Seeing the inner workings of a jury for the first time, what’s clear is that the deliberation room is a place of heightened emotion and jeopardy with huge stakes. It’ll provoke audiences to look at their own perspective and what they would do if faced with the ultimate decision. The series closes with a revealing episode you don’t want to miss!”

Northern Pictures, Series Director Tosca Looby said: “Creating this series has been a career highlight. It has required collaboration with a fabulous team across both drama and documentary, courts, and legal professionals and, most importantly, twelve ordinary citizens willing to put themselves to the test in a criminal trial. Despite months of precise planning, the final outcome was out of our hands and impossible to predict.”

Screen Australia, Head of Documentary Richard Huddleston said: “The insatiable appetite for true crime has created a plethora of content, so, in a crowded market you need your series to stand out from the crowd. The Jury: Death on the Staircase takes audiences into a high stakes environment with meticulous skill, craft, and the expertise of many. The result is a gripping audience offer that I hope Australians will be captivated by.”

Head of Screen NSW, Kyas Hepworth said: “Screen NSW is pleased to support this unique and compelling series, expertly created by the team at Northern Pictures. Given how difficult juries are to study, The Jury: Death on the Staircase will provide audiences with the chance to immerse themselves in the inner workings of the trial process and promises to be must-watch television when it premieres on SBS.”

The Jury: Death on the Staircase is a Northern Pictures production for SBS. Major production investment from SBS in association with Screen Australia. Financed with the assistance of Screen NSW, who also supported post, digital, and visual effects. Based on a format created by ScreenDog Productions and distributed by Blue Ant Studios.

The Jury: Death on the Staircase will be subtitled in Arabic, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese.

The Jury: Death on the Staircase airs weekly from Wednesday 6 November at 8.30pm on SBS with each episode then available to stream free on SBS On Demand.

MEET THE JURORS

Monique, 30 Funeral Attendant

Monique works in the funeral and crematorium business. Being close to death and bereavement has forged a unique level of empathy. She hates injustice and when she sees people who need help, her reflex is to do something useful, even if that comes with a personal cost. If witnessing prejudice or unfair bias, she will engage in conflict for the sake of her beliefs. Monique is aware that ‘the law is the law’ and evidence in a criminal trial must be considered objectively. She understands that as a juror, she will need to work hard to put her emotions aside.

Harrish, 25 Fintech Manager

Gentle spirit Harrish was born in New Zealand with Sri Lankan heritage. He’s a calm, well spoken, intelligent man. His strict upbringing has come with high expectations. After completing a Bachelor of Commerce, Harrish has kicked-off his career working for a ‘fintech’ start-up. He is very close with his family and still lives with his parents. Harrish has a deep affiliation with Tamil and Hindu heritage. He’s a keen public speaker and enjoys exchanging viewpoints, particularly with people from different cultural backgrounds.

Rose, 76

Retired Hospital Clerk

Rose is a grandmother with an infectious laugh. She came to Australia from the Philippines at the age of 21. A true global citizen, Rose’s father was Austrian, and she married an Irishman, but she feels more Aussie than anything else. Now retired, Rose held one of the most rewarding jobs available: A clerk in a hospital emergency department. She witnessed the good, the bad and the ugly of humanity.

Michael, 35

SCG Groundsman

Michael grew up in Sydney’s Sutherland Shire. He works as a groundsman at the SCG and, like so many Australians, he loves his sport. Michael is affable and friendly. Tears of joy make him more emotional than tears of sadness. Michael is not politically extreme, but his tattoo count is. He started getting inked as a way of dealing with pain when he was diagnosed with Ankylosing spondylitis, a crippling autoimmune disease that requires weekly injections. He has experienced judgement from afar because of his appearance and will take that experience into the courtroom with him. Argumentative if provoked, he understands the importance of compromise and believes this is the key to a peaceful society.

Anya, 54

Sex Therapist

Anya presents as an affable, open, and friendly middle-aged woman, but she is far from mainstream. She came to Australia alone from Siberia at the age of 23 with just $200 in her pocket. Adversity did not prevent her from building a life for herself and a career as a therapist specialising in sex and relationship counselling. She doesn’t believe in the institution of marriage and identifies as queer. A provocateur, Anya calls herself a ‘social justice warrior’ and claims to have a connection with, and understanding of, society’s minorities. She says her friends and family describe her accurately: extroverted, outspoken, opinionated, very progressive, and very direct!

Audrey, 51 Logistics Manager

Audrey is a Chinese woman who loves her job in logistics because she is an enthusiastic problem-solver. She says her eye for detail is her best trait. She also describes herself as observant, calm and quiet. Despite her quiet demeanour, Audrey embraces the job of people management. Audrey has had ‘complicated’ relationships. Audrey believes she will be the person in the jury room who absorbs facts, considers evidence from every angle, and clearly directs her fellow jurors toward a logical conclusion.

Tahi, 21

Music Graduate

Tahi’s heritage is Māori. He describes himself as ‘white passing’ so doesn’t directly experience the racism he believes exists in Australian society, but is very aware of prejudice around him, as both a gay man and someone with Indigenous heritage. Tahi grew up in a commune, living in the rainforest on the NSW North Coast and says his parents had a ‘complicated’ relationship. He now lives on the lower North Shore with his grandmother, who he describes as his best friend.

Kathy (age undisclosed) Retired Project Manager

Kathy is the daughter of Russian and Ukrainian parents and grew up as an only child in a very strict household. She was Head Prefect at school and rolled into a corporate career as a project manager in financial and consulting sectors. Kathy loved work and the feeling of always striving to break new ground. Kathy considers herself a perceptive person who will read the room, the people in it and their interactions. She believes people need to find middle ground when debating a point and if that can’t be achieved, they need to be able to be very clear and persuasive with their argument. Kathy has faith in the justice system and feels it should probably be harsher in its approach to crime.

Van, 48

Children’s Entertainer

Van is the divorced dad of two little girls and is trying to make a career as a singer- songwriter, specialising in children’s music. He was born in the Philippines but grew up in Western Sydney. Van is a devout Roman Catholic who attends church every Sunday.

Van believes that if a crime is committed, there should be an appropriate punishment.

Craig, 56

Former Prison Officer

Craig, or ‘Roachy’ as he is better known, is a self-described ‘cranky old bugger.’ He and his wife have 10 kids together, including a high-needs 12-year-old daughter with spina bifida. At 21 years of age, Craig started a career as a corrections officer, but gave it up after 14 years. Working in prisons, he witnessed extreme violence. He reckons he got through it because he was mentally tough, and because he didn’t empathise with inmates. He decided to get out when his family were threatened. His second career is a builder - and he loves it. To this day, Craig is wary of criminals, and he certainly doesn’t trust the justice system. He thinks lawyers will do whatever it takes, even lie, to win a case. He believes there are not enough prisons to lock everyone away, and as a result the system is a shambles. Craig says he was brought up in an age where men didn’t cry or show their feelings. He says he has changed since those days, and part of this change has included his conversion to Islam.

Guy, 69

Advertising Creative Director

British-born Guy is an advertising executive. True to his profession, he loves observing people and their behavioural traits and patterns to formulate his creative ideas. He has also recorded a Mensa-level IQ. Guy has lived and worked all over the world. Intimate working relationships with people from other backgrounds and cultures has led him to understand and sympathise with the prejudice and racism too many people endure in our society.

Mishelle, 50

Financial Consultant

Mishelle or ‘Mish’ is a spirited and vibrant ‘Westie’ at heart. She is the mother of two adult sons and is quick to smile and laugh. She grew up in the school of hard knocks in Fairfield and it’s left a strong impression on her. Mish is a big believer in humour to diffuse uncomfortable situations. She believes serving as a juror is an important civil duty and doesn’t understand why so many people see it as an inconvenience.

1 Like

The PDF version of the press release notes that names, dates, locations and images have been changed to protect identities in the original trial. It also includes brief profiles of the 12 jurors.

1 Like

Episode One

Wednesday, 6 November at 8.30pm
The 12 jurors are introduced to each other and the manslaughter case that will become the focus of their lives for the next eight days.

Episode Two

Wednesday, 13 November at 8.30pm
By day three of the trial, the jury is engrossed in the case and thoughtful about their role in it. They hear from a neighbour who heard the prelude to the tragedy.

Encore of last night’s premiere is on Saturday at 8:30pm

Episode Three: The Evidence

Wednesday, 20 November at 8.30pm

Day five of the trial delivers a series of surprises for the jury.

Episode 4

Thursday, 27 November at 8.30pm

The Reckoning

The jury is locked in passionate debate. Anya says they are all full of doubts and then Craig drops a bomb. Unable to agree on a unanimous verdict, the trial continues.

I’m really enjoying this.

Final episode

Wednesday, 4 December at 8.30pm

Episode Five: The Verdict

The unmissable conclusion to the true crime event. Having heard all the evidence, the real work begins for the jury. The jurors settle in for an emotionally charged debate. They work through their own experiences, the evidence, logic and the law, but will they reach a unanimous decision?

If you watched the series, what do you think of the jury’s verdict and the show’s format as a whole?

SBS has an article about the verdict and the real case the show was based on, but I won’t post the link for now.

I have to say, this might just be one of the best television series I have seen in a long time. The dynamics of that final deliberation were just so captivating. I for sure was convinced they were not going to come to a verdict. Those in the minority seemed too set in their thinking. I was also not expecting that ending (I won’t say any more to avoid spoilers for those who are still to watch it).

The format I thought worked really well. Seeing them hear the evidence and then discuss it during the breaks was interesting, and you could see how members were swayed back and forth across the length of the trial. The focus on each member’s individual experience was really good too, because you started to gain an understanding of why they were thinking the way they were. I would really like to see another series, but I would probably leave it for a year and then bring it back.

I’ve heard about this series but haven’t got around to watching it. The promotion and the synopsis really intrigues me.

The best Australian made series I have watched. Absolutely fascinated and they eventually came to the same conclusion I would have. I think this series showed what is wrong with the jury system though. And it really starts to make you question whether it is the best system in the judicial system. Personally if I were to be in this situation and I had a choice of a judge alone trial or jury trial I would be choosing a judge alone every time.

The Jury: Murder Trial (UK)

The UK production inspired by The Jury: Death on the Staircase commences Wednesday, 26 February at 8.35pm (4 parts) on SBS

Other way around

What would you do if someone’s life was in your hands? In an Australian first, SBS Original The Jury: Death on the Staircase takes inspiration from a smash-hit format from Channel 4 in the UK to provide insight and analysis on how juries work.

A casting call has gone out for a second season to be filmed later this year:

Link to the application in case anyone is interested: The Jury: Participant Questionnaire Survey

1 Like

Season 2

The ambitious five-part true crime event The Jury is back to recreate a historic, closely contested manslaughter case – word for word – in front of a brand-new jury.

From Today’s SBS Upfronts

The Jury is also returning for a second season. We’ve got another true crime, and just like series one, to have that same kind of reenactment of a real case presented, word for word by actors.

“Will different juries having a chance to look at exactly the same evidence reach the same verdict? I think it’s really fascinating Australian television that feels really distinctive and kind of wholly SBS.”

New for 2027 from SBS Upfronts

The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden revisits another landmark case, asking whether a new jury, presented with the same evidence and trial, will reach the same verdict.

New for 2027 from SBS Upfronts

The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden revisits another landmark case, asking whether a new jury, presented with the same evidence and trial, will reach the same verdict.

Twelve Strangers. One Man’s Fate. Is Justice Ever Free From Bias? SBS’s True Crime Event TV

The Jury Returns

What would you do if someone’s life was in your hands? Follow a real case, re-enacted from real court transcripts, in front of a new jury of 12 everyday Australians.

The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden premieres Monday 5 October on SBS and SBS On Demand

Could you convict a man when there is no clear cause of death, no weapon and no direct forensic evidence? The gripping SBS Original series The Jury returns with The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden, a shocking new true crime event that puts truth, justice and reasonable doubt to the test. The trailblazing social experiment will premiere on SBS and SBS on Demand from Monday 5 October.

Over five unmissable episodes, a new real Australian manslaughter trial is restaged with absolute fidelity, with professional actors recreating the proceedings word for word from original court transcripts. As in a real court, the fate of the defendant rests in the hands of a new jury of twelve everyday Australians, bringing a diverse range of ages, cultures and life experiences to the jury room. Putting the audience at the centre of the action as it unfolds, will the jury find the defendant guilty or decide the case has not been proven beyond reasonable doubt? Will they reach the same verdict as the original jury? And once their decision is in, will a final revelation force them to confront the chilling reality: that justice and truth aren’t always the same thing.

In this shocking new true crime case, the jury hears about the mysterious disappearance of a woman whose remains are discovered buried in the defendant’s former backyard a decade after she vanished. But with no confirmed time, location, cause or motive of death, the jury must decide whether the secret burial proves his guilt or whether suspicion belongs elsewhere.

What makes this new trial uniquely compelling and difficult, is the near-total absence of physical evidence. There are no fingerprints or forensic traces linking the defendant to the death, and no smoking gun. The case rests almost entirely on human testimony, forcing jurors to judge how witnesses carry themselves, whether their accounts ring true and what moments of hesitation or certainty might reveal. Credibility and composure become crucial pieces of evidence.

Some studies suggest fewer than a third of Australians trust the courts and justice system. ¹ To examine why, the series steps inside the jury room, a traditionally secret and sacrosanct “black box” sealed from the outside world, to reveal the raw mechanics of a criminal trial.

As the pressure mounts, personal biases and life experiences clash. The room fractures along generational lines. Younger millennials strive to play strictly by the legal rules, while older jurors rely on gut instincts and life experience. Personal histories of addiction, domestic abuse and grief bleed into the jury room, proving that justice is never purely objective.

As deliberations reach breaking point, the jury is locked in a tense deadlock and must fight its way to a verdict. But when the decision is finally delivered, the trial is far from over. In a shocking final twist, everything they believe about the case is upended. The revelations force them to question not only their verdict, but the system that asked them to deliver it. If justice is based on only part of the truth, can it truly be justice?

Taking inspiration from Channel 4’s smash-hit UK format, this ambitious Australian production brought together 16 actors, 18 cameras and dozens of crew as well as the jury of twelve for a two-week shoot inside Sydney’s historic Justice and Police Museum. A 1,700-page transcript from a real criminal trial was transformed into a 500-page production script, generating more than 520 hours of footage across the courtroom and jury room.

SBS Senior Commissioning Editor Bethan Arwel-Lewis said: “Following the success of the first season we are really excited to bring The Jury back with this intriguing case. By taking Australians inside the jury room, it exposes some raw truths about how we make decisions about people’s futures, how personal experience, bias and group pressure can influence the pursuit of justice. It is gripping true crime that invites us all to become the ‘13th juror’ and consider whether we would trust 12 strangers to decide another person’s fate and invites us to think - what verdict would we deliver if we were in their shoes?

The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden is a Northern Pictures production developed and produced in association with SBS and financed in association with Screen NSW. Post-produced in New South Wales, Australia, with the assistance of the NSW Government. Based on a format created by ScreenDog Productions and distributed by Blue Ant Studios.

Northern Pictures Executive Producer Karina Holden said “Season 2 of The Jury is full of twists and shifting dynamics that you genuinely don’t see coming. It surprised us all in production, even after the experience of making Season 1 with its bombshell ending. I think viewers are going to be taken on an even more unexpected ride as this season constantly challenges your assumptions about the case, the jurors and where the deliberations will ultimately land.”

Screen NSW Executive Director Kylie Munnich said: “The first season of The Jury made for compelling and compulsive viewing, giving audiences a deeper understanding of how the courts and justice system operate. With its unique blend of factual and dramatic storytelling, Screen NSW is pleased to support the team at Northern Pictures to bring another season of The Jury to SBS.”

The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden will be subtitled in Arabic, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Korean and Vietnamese.

SBS On Demand

Episodes 1-4 of The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden will be available to stream on SBS On Demand from Monday 5 October. The final episode and verdict reveal will be available Tuesday 13 October.

SBS

The Jury: Skeleton in the Garden premieres Monday 5 October at 7.30pm on SBS, launching a five-night event across two weeks:

Monday 5 October 7.30pm Episode 1

Tuesday 6 October 7.30pm Episode 2

Wednesday 7 October 7.30pm Episode 3

Monday 12 October 7.30pm Episode 4

Tuesday 13 October 7.30pm Final Episode and Verdict Reveal

* All names, dates and locations have been changed to anonymise the case.

1. Rule of Law Survey 2025: https://www.ruleoflaw.org.au/rule-of-law-survey-2025/

MEET THE JURORS

SAHAR, 38

BUSINESS ANALYST

Sahar is a force of intellect, conviction and constant reinvention. An Iranian-Australian who has moved through multiple careers – from pharmacist to IT analyst, to political candidate – she resists being defined by any single path. Instead, she’s driven by values: equality, justice and a fierce commitment to challenging systems she sees as unjust. Articulate and fearless in debate, Sahar speaks with clarity and purpose, particularly when advocating for women or marginalised groups. Her political identity is unapologetically left-wing, shaped in part by her upbringing.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Sahar brings emotional intensity to the deliberations, acutely sensitive to power imbalances and victim-blaming. She is highly observant of behaviour, making her a powerful advocate for meticulous fact checking.

TIM, 28

MUSICIAN

Tim is charismatic, articulate and intellectually agile, with a life story that disrupts first impressions. Educated, well-spoken and outwardly polished, he once thrived in the fast-paced world of advertising before a substance addiction derailed his trajectory. Now in recovery, he brings a level of self-awareness and emotional depth that contrasts with his confident exterior.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Tim is a powerhouse. Hyper-logical and legally literal, he gets incredibly exasperated when the room slides into amateur sleuthing and personality judgments. His lived experience allows him to deeply sympathise with the stressors of addiction, frequently acting as the voice of legal due diligence.

SUE, 75

HAIRDRESSER

A rock-singing grandmother guided more by spontaneity than a rigid rulebook, Sue has spent a lifetime following instinct over caution. Born in England and now firmly Australian, her life has been marked by bold, impulsive decisions – four marriages, including one to a man whose surname she didn’t know, and moving across the world on a whim. Sue still performs on stage with her husband’s band – who is 17 years her junior – fuelled by energy, humour and a love of attention. Warm, witty and endlessly sociable, she is a natural storyteller who draws people in quickly. Beneath the charm lies contradiction: she holds firmly to old-school values yet is surprisingly open to being persuaded.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Sue is a fascinating bellwether for the room. While she is quick to react to courtroom testimony, she is highly empathetic to the toll of a broken marriage and substance abuse, revealing that her own personal history shapes how she views the victim.

MUNESH, 40

TRAVEL AGENT

Munesh is calm, introspective and deeply grounded – a quiet presence that carries significant emotional weight. Of Fijian-Indian heritage, he is closely connected to his cultural roots and guided by a strong sense of family, responsibility and service. Balancing his career as a travel agent with crisis volunteering, he has developed a capacity to listen with patience and empathy, particularly when others are struggling. His steadiness is hard-won, shaped by personal challenges he rarely speaks about, but reveals later in the series. Munesh became a proud father for the first time just four days before the trial began.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Munesh is not driven by ego. He speaks thoughtfully and sparingly, acting as a cooling anchor when tempers flare. He is exceptionally articulate about balancing moral intuition with the rigid strictness of the law.

GEOFF, 23

SALES MANAGER

Geoff is thoughtful, composed and quietly authoritative beyond his years. Outwardly, he fits the mold of the affable, young man – athletic, articulate and socially confident. But beneath that surface lies a deeper emotional complexity shaped by personal tragedy. The violent murder of a close friend has profoundly altered his view of the world, leaving him with both empathy and a simmering anger at systemic failures.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Geoff is self-aware about his privilege and strives to approach situations with balance and integrity. He is deeply frustrated by the lack of direct physical evidence and acts as a vocal protector of the minority votes, reminding everyone that a jury is not a game of Survivor.

MENAKA, 77

FORMER HR DIRECTOR

Menaka is formidable, insightful and deeply principled woman whose life experience commands attention. Having fled an abusive relationship as a young mother, she spent decades as an HR director and advocating for women and others facing systemic disadvantage. Menaka combines compassion with discipline: she is deeply empathetic, yet unwavering in her commitment to fairness, accountability, and process.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Menaka is the natural matriarch of the jury room. She uses her decades of HR management to help organise the whiteboard, pull the group together and facilitate open debate. She cuts through side-chatter and forces the room to synthesize logic over runaway emotion.

SUZANNA, 27

SOCIAL WORKER

Born to Russian and Ukrainian parents, Suzanna is sharp, perceptive and direct, with an intensity that can sometimes put her at odds with others. Raised by her grandmother after her mother struggled with mental health and her father served time in prison, she grew up quickly, learning to read people and situations with care. Neurodivergent with ADHD, she processes the world quickly, making connections others might miss, though she can become restless or fixate when something doesn’t sit right. Now working in the community sector, she brings a grounded, people-first perspective, driven by empathy as much as lived experience.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Attuned to bias and group dynamics, she is inclined to question a rush to judgment, often encouraging others to pause and look again. Her father’s incarceration informs her instinct to examine both the evidence and the assumptions around it. While she can be persistent – and occasionally tests others’ patience – her focus remains on keeping the discussion fair.

SHIRLEY, 29

FINANCIAL RISK CONSULTANT

Shirley is precise, driven, and intellectually formidable. Her unusual upbringing – marked by instability and secrecy as a child of professional poker players – has made her a fiercely independent and disciplined thinker. Now working in financial risk, she approaches problems with analytical rigour and little patience for emotional reasoning. Shirley prides herself on being “cutthroat” in her decision-making, resisting any impulse to let sympathy cloud her judgment – though that instinct isn’t as absent as she would like to believe.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Drawing on her background as a poker player, Shirley is quick to read human psychology, dismantle weak arguments and regulate her emotions. She is unafraid to be the lone dissenting vote in a deadlocked room, holding the line on cold, hard logic. Yet beneath that control, she carries a quiet sensitivity to vulnerability.

JOHN, 29

AI TRAINER

John is a man shaped by faith, discipline and a deep belief in personal responsibility. Raised in a missionary family in Kenya and Papua New Guinea, his early life was defined by service, structure and a strong moral framework. Now living a quiet life in suburban Sydney working as an AI trainer, he presents as calm, polite and grounded. John doesn’t preach, but his Christian beliefs inform how he sees everything: justice, accountability, gender roles and the structure of society itself. He values order, clarity and truth.

IN THE JURY ROOM: in John is quietly immovable and highly analytical. He is quick to spot inconsistencies in the investigation and push back against speculation, often acting as a grounding voice of reason when the room descends into chaos.

HICKO, 66

GARBAGE TRUCK DRIVER

Hicko is the embodiment of the Aussie larrikin – blunt, cheeky and utterly unapologetic. A self-described “garbologist”, he takes pride in hard work, routine and the simple rhythms of life. Surrounded by a large family of six children and 18 grandkids, his worldview is firmly rooted in old-school values: personal responsibility, tough love and a deep skepticism of what he sees as modern “nonsense” or political correctness.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Don’t let the cheeky exterior fool you – Hicko brings razor-sharp, blue-collar problem-solving to the table. While he initially leads with his gut, he is deeply humble and willing to change his mind.

KRISTY, 46

PAEDIATRIC AUDIOLOGIST

Kristy is energetic, inquisitive and relentlessly engaged – a whirlwind of friendliness and enthusiasm. A lifelong Penrith local working as a paediatric audiologist, she embodies a familiar suburban archetype: the approachable, talkative, ever-curious neighbour. Her fascination with true crime gives her a sense of purpose and excitement, and she approaches situations with the mindset of an “amateur sleuth”.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Kristy thrives in the group setting, asking rapid-fire questions and absorbing the perspectives around her. While she loves to play detective, she is highly empathetic and is moved to tears when the legal limitations of the system are finally exposed to her.

PAUL, 61

PHOTOGRAPHER

Paul brings a depth of lived experience that few others in the room can match. His life has been marked by hardship – foster care, homelessness, mental health struggles and years entangled in the criminal justice system. He has since rebuilt his life through faith, community and quiet perseverance. Now working as a photographer, he carries himself with humility and warmth. Paul is not loud or attention-seeking; he observes closely, listens deeply and chooses his moments with care. There is a quiet stillness to him, as though he is guided as much by instinct as by reason.

IN THE JURY ROOM: Paul acts as a calm, watchful presence, often sitting outside the noise of the group as he takes in not only what’s being said, but the feeling in the room. Having once stood in the dock himself, he approaches the responsibility of judgment with deep gravity. He resists being pulled into reactive debate, instead grounding himself before he speaks. When he does, it’s measured and considered – often cutting through tension or reframing the conversation in ways others hadn’t quite reached.