Mark Llewellyn according to the super at the start.
Not sure the slow, breathy narration is appropriate.
Mark Llewellyn according to the super at the start.
Not sure the slow, breathy narration is appropriate.
Can we expect a âcorrecting the recordâ from the ABC tomorrow?
Weâll see. But one thing for sure, is that footage will be used in Craigâs defamation case against them. Because it would have been part of the discovery stage of the proceedings.
Interesting that Seven chose not to have any of their talent as a face to this show. All questioning by unseen producer.
Who is doing the narrating because the ladyâs voiceover sounds familiar.
By getting a producer in Mark to conduct the interview it definitely is a due diligence thing, reduce the number involved in the doco, in case they are subsequently sued etc.
Iâm actually finding this quite interesting viewing.
Thereâs also been parts of tonightâs special which seem to preview the arguments/evidence that Craigâs lawyers will be making/putting forth in said defamation case
Craig McLachlan posted a thank you to his fans on Instagram last night. All of the comments I read were supportive of McLachlan - I didnât see a negative comment.
thatâs on at 6pm everynight.
To me it felt like they were trying to make it a one sided pro-Craig show, but all those extreme closeups and bad editing just made him look like more of a creep and really exposed his bad acting.
It wasnât an acting role.
Someone should have told Craig.
The problem is that he hasnât been able to give his side of the story whereas the accusers had their story told on the ABC.
Agree about the editing, and some of the things mentioned in the show werenât really necessary. Probably couldâve fitted it into an hour rather than 90 minutes.
that article loses all credibility after:
The special titled Horror Story which ran last night was a well-produced piece of television which showed both sides of the story.
from what iâve seen both sides of the argument are unified on the opinion that last nights show was garbage.
Exactly. But that doesnât mean that Channel 7 had to pay him and broadcast an interview with him. McLachlan can take a milk crate down to The Domain in Sydney on Sunday afternoon and rant his heart out to whomever is wandering by, or as I wrote yesterday he can set up his own website.
I donât understand why we want to silence people?
Iâm not disputing the fact heâs eccentric and perhaps a bit of a creep. But he wasnât convicted.
I donât know him personally and therefore Iâm not one to judge, I leave that up to the actual judge.
And as such now that he has not been found guilty, there comes a time where his story should be told.
Evidently that story did not do his image many favours - so Iâm struggling to see the issue here. If his accusers want the world to see him for what he really is - thereâs 90 minutes of prime time television that does just that.