I only got a DAB radio just prior to launch, so missed out on those early tests. I do recall 2GB and others testing MP2; I think 2GB was running 192 kpbs.
I think the Triple M stable of DAB stations use higher bitrates for their webstreams- a conspiracy to hasten the demise of DAB?
Went up to Oberon today and had the Sangean DPR-34 pocket radio with me. I forgot my earphones so reception was just with the included (diminutive) whip.
Sydney DAB was just audible with a stable signal from the Lions Club lookout (tx site for 2BS 105.5). The mandatory trip to Shooters Hill (1353 m) was made; surprisingly reception was only marginally better there at a stable 1/5 bars.
I forgot to try Canberra DAB at Shooters Hill, which may be possible, particularly on an in-car unit. Tropo conditions were rock bottom so I doubt it would have been there today.
I took a squiz at that one. Has most of the same issues I’ve identified with the Aldi one, except it’s $15 cheaper. No AUX, poor number of presets and no Bluetooth.
As previously discussed here many times, a number of markets are complex to adequately service (taking into account technical, commerical and ‘political’ issues) so I’m not surprised that a few smaller markets have popped up before larger ones - this allows the industry to hit some “low hanging fruit” demonstrating expansion while working on resolving complex ones
A smart move from the industry if they want a funding injection - not a great look if your a punter
I like that of the “three extra” stations on Darwin DAB - two of them are already on analogue radio.
Darwin digital radio will only get interesting once the community stations have access - if it’s a viable path for them to experiment, Territory FM could do interesting things. But is there any indication they’d bother?
What examples of audio processors do DAB+ stations use? I’m sure it’s a mix of solutions, but do they generally have separate processing to their FM signal?