Not really trying to change a legal system when pets of counrty already do what I have said. There is always room for improvement. But I have always said I wanted to change the world - perhaps this is how I will do it
I just see the way juries have worked in the past. Even from the times of the witch trials. Anyone accused of being a witch was found to be guilty of being a witch. And it was because it was a ‘trend’. It’s a similar case now everyone wants to see a priest go down for a sex crime. There is this I distrust and prejudice against the church. And I am not suggesting he is innocent or even saying he is guilty. I am just saying everyone wants, espcially the media, to see a priest go to jail. Now if it turns out he is found guilty from a judge in the appeals court the jury has obviously got the decision right. I just feel there was some injustice and prejudice that could have went on, which would have been avoided if a judge alone trial was undertaken.