Yes but not $1b massive.
Everyone knew CA were obsessed with the magically $1b figure so after all the back and forth, why end up offering $960m?
Ten only have themselves to blame.
Yes but not $1b massive.
Everyone knew CA were obsessed with the magically $1b figure so after all the back and forth, why end up offering $960m?
Ten only have themselves to blame.
its close enough to the magic figure. has a FTA network offered that amount of money alone for AFL or NRL? probably not.
Because they wanted the full package, why else would someone stump up that sort of cash for a few months of the year.
I think your maths is a bit awry there. I donāt think Ten offered 960 million and Foxtel only offered 1.4 million.
Cricket Australiaās board includes former captain Mark Taylor who also happened to be a Channel Nine commentator.
The $1.4 should be $222,000,000, not sure how I came at $1.4. One billion is one thousand million, the combined deal from Foxtel/Seven is $1,182,000,000.
Part of the agreement is for Seven and Fox to use Fujitsu air conditioners in their commentary boxes.
No, mate. You should have paid more attention to what you wrote. You had millions instead of billions.
Oh, forget it.
Which is why I fixed it. No idea where I got 1.4 from.
I think youāre the one getting your millions and billions confused.
The article overwhelmingly mentions executives, rather than non-executives (i.e.) board.
Sutherland and Amarfio.
Least next season I wonāt have to watch Youtube quality BBL matches on One, always shoved over to One due to Ten News and The Project.
That article certainly improves my opinion of Ten.
āTherefore, has the Communications Minister already agreed to waive this statutory condition?ā
Yes, on Friday he verbally waived it through. The author of that article missed an important point.
Sure, if youāve got Fox Sports or plan on subscribing.
Iām fairly sure Seven would do the same thing as to not interrupt their flagship 6pm news bulletin.
According to the ABC article it was $1.2 billion ($750 million from Foxtel and $450 million from Seven)
If this is true, then although Ten might not get the rights, perhaps they should try for at least $300 million in compensation from CA. Because lets face it, Peever didnt want Ten re him calling them āBottom feedersā .This and a possible threat of Foxtel walking lead us to the current outcome
Cricket Australia are taking a big gamble on the games future and really they only format will be reachable will be test cricket to non-pay tv sports subscribers.
According to The Sunday Telegraph, both Seven and Fox Sports will be able to show archives from Nineās cricket coverage over the past 40 years during rain interruptions, as Cricket Australia now owns the vision.
Wasnāt that one of the items which could be bid on? So essentially they failed to monetise the archives. Gold star CA.
Seven and Fox Sports might have both paid for the use of Nineās cricket archives.
The whole deal needs a gold star award to CA. I thought V8SC was the worse deal ever, but CA said watch this space we will show you how you can stuff the whole game up.
I am so looking forward to the numbers watching the cricket on Seven. I still think Seven think Test cricket is the one Aussies watch the most!
Just look at last summer, and the ratings behind the one-days compare the pair!