Antisiphoning list

1 Like

No doubt the Government will decide that “free” means “FTA network” so it protects the crumbling empires of the legacy television networks.


Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications today released its report on the Communications Legislation Amendment (Prominence and Anti-siphoning) Bill. The recommendations are:

  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Communications and the Australian Communications and Media Authority consider options for a phased approach to the proposed prominence framework and or a reduction to a 12-month timeframe.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Communications request that the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, and the Arts prioritise the implementation of radio prominence on devices such as smart speakers.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Communications amend the bill to extend free-to-air codes of practice to online services.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Communications, on advice from the Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development, Communications, and the Arts amend the bill to allow the review of the prominence framework to be conducted within two years of implementation, as necessitated by rapid technological change.
  • The committee recommends that the Minister for Communications consider, either before or as part of the prominence framework review, other related reforms in the industry, to reflect the growing role of the internet, online service provision, and consumer behaviour.
  • The committee recommends, subject to the recommendations contained earlier in this chapter, that the prominence provisions of the bill be passed.
  • The committee recommends that the anti-siphoning provisions of the bill be passed.

Full report

Seven’s response to the Senate committee report

1 Like

TV networks unite to keep sport free for all Australians

The Seven, Nine and 10 networks have joined forces to launch a new advertising campaign this morning urging the Federal Government to amend its proposed changes to the anti-siphoning Bill.

With the Bill coming before Federal Parliament this week, the new “Free Sport Is On The Line” ads are running across print, online and social media.

The key issue for the commercial free-to-air television industry is that the Bill only addresses access to free sport for Australians who watch through an aerial, which represents only 61% of people, a proportion that is declining. It ignores people who access TV content through connected TV apps and mobile devices. The industry also wants the government to apply the prominence framework to TV sets already in the market.

Seven West Media Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Jeff Howard, said: “We welcome the government’s plan to keep sports for free on broadcast TV, but it needs to do more: it must recognise the way people watch sport is changing and extend the amendments to the anti-siphoning regime to include free streaming.

“It’s very simple: the new Bill only guarantees free sports for Australians who have an aerial. It does not guarantee people will get free sport if they choose to stream it over the internet or don’t have an aerial. No aerial is going to mean no access to free sport in the future.

“Under the current proposed rules, Australians who don’t use an aerial will not have guaranteed access to free sport. The clock is ticking: as people increasingly use the internet to watch sport, they are going to have to pay unless the government acts now.”

Mike Sneesby, Chief Executive Officer of Nine, said: “Australian audiences need to be able to watch sport for free whenever and however they choose to enjoy it. We need the government to deliver the anti-siphoning framework that ensures we can continue to provide this for all Australians.”

Network 10 President and Head of Streaming and Regional Lead, Paramount ANZ, Beverley McGarvey, said: “When Australians go to free-to-air TV, they increasingly don’t even think of an aerial as the gateway, they simply access our channels and content whenever they want, wherever they are and on whatever device they choose.

“It’s no different with the big sports events. Australians’ free access to the Australian Formula One Grand Prix or the Matildas and Socceroos shouldn’t be governed by how they choose to access our channels. They don’t think that way and neither should the government when devising the anti-siphoning and prominence laws for all Australians and their TVs.”

More information can be found at Free TV Australia’s Free For Everyone website.


Free TV CEO Greg Haywood has written an opinion piece in Monday’s edition of Australian Financial Review, explaining why it is important for the federal government to amend the proposed changes to the anti-siphoning bill.


Funny how FreeTV and the networks are up in arms about the small percentage of people who could not watch sport if another company offers to pay more for the rights

Yet they’ve been silent in the slow removal and death of scripted Australian drama from our screens putting it all behind streaming pay walls


I prefer to see my sports ad free

At the moment I think it also depends on what you want to watch as the FTA networks have been buying up rights to everything that Foxtel won’t.

Sunrise this morning

1 Like