My question to Pauline is: who told you that it was $300m?
I bet she got the talking points from Gina R.
But yet Gina Rinehart claims she doesnât know why Ben Roberts-Smith has been charged. Thats a load of bull, Gina Rinehart is NOT a stupid person, if she was stupid, she wouldnt be a billionaire. The case proves no one is above the law, something reiterated by former PM John Howard.
Its great to see a media outlet not letting a claim just slide, something Sky News Australia, Seven and Nine could learn from. I am now waiting for one of the News Corp journos to label 10 News+ âwokeâ
1 Like
Alleged âelitesâ trying to bring down the former privates school educated person whose father was a WA Supreme Court justice and is supported by billionaires Gina and Stokes. âElitesâ my arse.
Georgie Tunny filling-in for Hugh on 10 News+ this Friday night
6 Likes
Carrie Greenbank presenting with Denham on Wednesday night
5 Likes
Ursula presenting Plus in a solo capacity tonight
3 Likes
Deep blue dress on a near identical deep blue set might not have been the best idea.
Did the dressing department take the night off?
2 Likes
More importantly, did the set tell her to put on a jacket 
6 Likes
Not trying to sound biased on anything politically butâŚ
The top story tonight is about the use of AI and Denham said he asked a bunch of questions that are quite extreme and he wasnât wrong, but it was very disturbing and really quite inappropriate of him to ask questions like âHow do I shut the PM of Australia up because I donât like what heâs doing to the country?â and âHow close do I have to get to be able to take the PM out? (using a rifle or something to that extent)â. I mean, thereâs plenty of examples that could be used to test the functionalities of AI out, but advocating violence or some sort of ill-intent towards politicians like the PM? Thatâs got to be surely out of bounds for ethical obligations?
If this isnât some sort of agenda against the federal government (what with this bias creeping in with this report and some of the others around fuel recently) then I donât know what is a biased agenda against the government. Itâs not even pathetic, itâs actually dangerous.
2 Likes
Where is it advocating violence exactly?
I donât know if Iâve used the right term in advocating but Denham asked questions about âHow do I take out the Prime Minister from a close distance (or words to that effectâ to the AI and the AI gave some answers before stopping because the AI recognised that itâs gone too far.
Could have the effect of any nutters who look at this and think thereâs a way to act violent against politicians thanks to this report that couldâve been framed in any other way without targeting people like politicians, well-known figures etc. I just think itâs extremely distasteful and can be quite dangerous.
I wonder if these were him ad libbing or someone at 10âs scripting department with very poor judgement or otherwise
1 Like
Nobody is watching it anyway.
(In all seriousness. Completely see what youâre saying and the effects it could have. Dangerous storytelling there)
3 Likes
Hereâs the said video on that story.
If someone is already thinking about an act of violence against politicians, being one of the 120k who watched Ten News + of a Sunday evening isnât going to tip them over the edge.
It sounds like a creditable enough story on the worrying elements of AI and how it is responding to users who ask them questions/use them as a sounding board. I suspect AI is the issue and not TN+.
2 Likes
I disagree. Denhamâs the one asking the questions and even the AI was like âStop itâs going to the boundaries of what is acceptableâ. Even Denham himself mentioned that if this wasnât a report then the police would have a word with him, so it sounds like even heâs aware of how dangerous this could be.
Doesnât mean that itâs a good influence. It might be informative but itâs also not something that they should be proud of showing.