# Paramount Australia & New Zealand

**URL:** <https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590>\
**Category:** Ten Network\
**Created:** [January 11, 2016, 4:31am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590 "2016-01-11T04:31:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JasonF](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/jasonf/32/349220_2.png) [@JasonF](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/JasonF)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2017, 10:33am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/539 "2017-06-30T10:33:10Z")

</div>

thats an subscriber only article

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TV-ACT](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/tv-act/32/167823_2.png) [@TV-ACT](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/TV-ACT)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2017, 10:50am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/540 "2017-06-30T10:50:50Z")

</div>

> **[Receivers set to be appointed to Network Ten](http://www.canberratimes.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/receivers-set-to-be-appointed-to-network-ten-20170629-gx1qi5.html)**
>
> Receivers are set to be appointed to Network Ten, which has been in administration for two weeks.

  
Wow, this is disappointing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![killy06](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/killy06/32/366375_2.png) [@killy06](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/killy06)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2017, 10:51am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/541 "2017-06-30T10:51:02Z")

</div>

> [@JasonF](#):
>
> thats an subscriber only article

To get around it, just google “CBA to appoint Network Ten receiver”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TV\_Addict](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/tv_addict/32/317_2.png) [@TV\_Addict](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/TV_Addict)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2017, 2:14pm UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/543 "2017-06-30T14:14:30Z")

</div>

So what’s the likely outcome?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eddel](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/eddel/32/362830_2.png) [@eddel](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/eddel)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2017, 2:32pm UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/544 "2017-06-30T14:32:22Z")

</div>

All that it means at this stage is that nothing can happen without CBA being happy that their financial interests are being protected.

It’s more than likely just a firm push back against whatever sneaky games Murdoch/Gordon are up to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tane04](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/tane04/32/348677_2.png) [@Tane04](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/Tane04)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2017, 12:00am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/545 "2017-07-01T00:00:16Z")

</div>

[http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2017/06/ppb-to-be-appointed-as-ten-receivers.html](http://www.tvtonight.com.au/2017/06/ppb-to-be-appointed-as-ten-receivers.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Haydos](https://forums.mediaspy.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/cdc98d/32.png) [@Haydos](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/Haydos)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2017, 12:48am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/546 "2017-07-01T00:48:29Z")

</div>

Some light relief on this forum Thoughts on Salaries for Top 10 on-air Personalities?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bacco007](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/bacco007/32/99038_2.png) [@bacco007](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/bacco007)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2017, 1:05am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/547 "2017-07-01T01:05:00Z")

</div>

> [@eddel](#):
>
> It’s more than likely just a firm push back against whatever sneaky games Murdoch/Gordon are up to.

saw a comment the first time receivers were reported that CBA are long term Murdoch bankers - not sure whether there is anything in that, but it does make things a little interesting

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![littlegezzybear](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/littlegezzybear/32/219836_2.png) [@littlegezzybear](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/littlegezzybear)\
**Post date:** [July 2, 2017, 2:14pm UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/548 "2017-07-02T14:14:41Z")

</div>

Before Ten was put into administration, CBS had proposed in negotiations to slash the price of their output deal with Ten in exchange for shares in the company. The AFR is speculating that CBS is a possible bidder for Ten, with CBS able to run the network at a lower cost if they are supplying their own programming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![littlegezzybear](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/littlegezzybear/32/219836_2.png) [@littlegezzybear](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/littlegezzybear)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 2:06am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/549 "2017-07-03T02:06:00Z")

</div>

Announcement to the ASX this morning. Murdoch, Gordon and Packer are guaranteeing the funding.

[https://scontent-syd2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/19601244\_10209525472958232\_7855608906876833248\_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=f52eb9b2cf3d074d5b1ea92ca674cb66&oe=59DABF62](https://scontent-syd2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/fr/cp0/e15/q65/19601244_10209525472958232_7855608906876833248_n.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=f52eb9b2cf3d074d5b1ea92ca674cb66&oe=59DABF62)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShadowDan](https://forums.mediaspy.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/3da27b/32.png) [@ShadowDan](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/ShadowDan)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 3:09am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/550 "2017-07-03T03:09:57Z")

</div>

So they are going to guarantee another loan but not the one that’s due at the end of the year?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicholas](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/nicholas/32/114_2.png) [@Nicholas](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/Nicholas)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 7:01am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/551 "2017-07-03T07:01:14Z")

</div>

What’s this mean then? Are they still going to look for another buyer? Is this loan just for the short term until another buyer is found?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmo](https://forums.mediaspy.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/d78d45/32.png) [@cmo](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/cmo)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 7:02am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/552 "2017-07-03T07:02:48Z")

</div>

Looks like PBB want to find a buyer.

They guarantee a loan now but wouldn’t continue to do so before. That’s weird and shows they have an agenda.

I’m still hoping for CBS to be involved in owning ten.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JBar](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/jbar/32/151177_2.png) [@JBar](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/JBar)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 7:08am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/553 "2017-07-03T07:08:26Z")

</div>

So you keep saying every second day but why would a foreign buyer be better? Last time it happened we saw thr channel decimated and flooded with cheap North American product. That would probably be tragic because we’ll probably see all their CBS product take priority more than it does now to the detriment of Aussie programming and anything from other suppliers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SydneyCityTV](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/sydneycitytv/32/66248_2.png) [@SydneyCityTV](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/SydneyCityTV)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 7:11am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/554 "2017-07-03T07:11:11Z")

</div>

A CBS-owned Ten would probably be better than either News Corp or WIN owning the network, but that really isn’t saying much.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JBar](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/jbar/32/151177_2.png) [@JBar](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/JBar)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 7:14am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/555 "2017-07-03T07:14:26Z")

</div>

I think I’d like to see WIN have a go at running it without the influence of NewsCorp. I think they coild take it in a better direction.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmo](https://forums.mediaspy.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/d78d45/32.png) [@cmo](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/cmo)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 7:43am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/556 "2017-07-03T07:43:27Z")

</div>

They have to produce 55% Australian content anyway.

When was the last foreign buyer?? Can west. They made it profitable then it was able to float and invest in big programming. And they still had a news  
Department throughout that whole time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![akymbo82](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/akymbo82/32/38692_2.png) [@akymbo82](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/akymbo82)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 11:05am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/557 "2017-07-03T11:05:07Z")

</div>

> [@Nicholas](#):
>
> Is this loan just for the short term until another buyer is found?

What it means is that these two have brought themselves time, as they wait for parliament to come back from its winter break (wish we all had a winter break… don’t get me started), they’ll vote on the new media laws. Once that get passed, Murdoch and co will put in an offer for ten and own the channels of 10!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nicholas](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/nicholas/32/114_2.png) [@Nicholas](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/Nicholas)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 11:11am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/558 "2017-07-03T11:11:07Z")

</div>

Thanks for the clarification. If that’s the case, then lets hope that the media laws do not pass 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ShadowDan](https://forums.mediaspy.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/s/3da27b/32.png) [@ShadowDan](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/ShadowDan)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2017, 11:39am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590/559 "2017-07-03T11:39:39Z")

</div>

We are assuming it but with Hanson holding out and probably few others too I don’t think it will⌚️  
Surely the administrators would reject bids from Murdoch and co. (But sadly they wouldn’t be able to block the bids)  
Surely they would not inflico SkyTen or WinTen on us…😛

[Previous page](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590.md?page=26)

[Next page](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/paramount-australia-new-zealand/590.md?page=28)
