Nine Tennis Coverage


#739

I actually saw some comments online praising Hamish McLachlan and missing him, as well as a LOT of comments saying they miss Seven’s coverage in general.

I’m 50/50, I don’t think Nine have vastly improved on Seven’s coverage which I believed was their best of what the network covered.

I like Nine’s stronger on-air appearance with the studio and hosts, as well as 9Now having all streams in HD for free.

What I think has been terrible is not telling viewers about other matches on the app or 9Gem, they may have shown them, but clearly didn’t tell viewers where to find them, so something sneaky going on there.


#740

Hmm…

Just like cricket on Nine, tennis just doesn’t feel like tennis when it’s not on Seven. It’s been an institution for many years on the network and without it it feels…off

Not discrediting Nine’s efforts but just saying…

Seven’s coverage wasn’t world-class but it was perfectly acceptable compared to the dregs of their cricket and AFL coverage.

Nine’s online innovation is one of the strongest improvements to the coverage. With the world moving quickly from linear TV to streaming this allows Nine to remain competitive with other streaming services. Their hosts are pretty good, as are most of their commentators (many of whom are from Seven).


#741

Credit where credit is due, pretty sure it was actually Seven who were the innovators with the app and live streams, which exploded in popularity (even if we were behind the times).

Nine have just continued the platform on their own, but taking away the feee for all courts and HD.


#742

The coverage has vastly improved from 7.

7 used to charge viewers to watch all courts


#743

9Gem has gone back to normal programming (ancient movie reruns) whilst there are still multiple matches in progress…


#744

Online coverage, yes.

Overall, there’s still some areas that needs to be improved. Their own graphics would be great and they shouldn’t have Kyrgios commentating. His ego is irritating.


#745

[quote=“Tom_TV7, post:744, topic:4957”] Their own graphics would be great
[/quote]

Why? The graphics package is excellent. If you use your own style then you’re changing styles between transitions etc… these graphics are fresh and strong.


#746

Nine’s commentary team and presenters are certainly superior to Seven’s.


#747

Even though the main callers are still Courier and Smith?


#748

Yep. The fact they don’t have the likes of McLachlan and Basil anywhere near a commentary box makes the Nine team superior.


#749

Basil was fine as a host but his commentary (if you can call it that, more like a summary) was atrocious. Glad Nine isn’t using their hosts (Tony, Bec, James) as commentators. Leave the commentary to the experts.


#750

9Gem’s coverage should have continued until the end of quarter finals, because not everyone has access to 9Now.


#751

Really? Would love to see a couple of examples.


#752

Tom Rehn had a chat with prime minister Scott Morrison at rod laver arena during the match.


#753

To provide just a few…

NB/ I agree about Basil. I didn’t think much of Hamish’s calling either, but his hosting was pretty good, especially natural/ad lib banter or when taking viewers around the grounds (“that’s on Two, the breaker on the app but back we go in RLA for this”).

Also, unlike Basil, Hamish had at least been part of the coverage for a decade and comes from a strong sport and sports admin background.

Each to their own :slight_smile:


#754

Nine need to get better with updating scores which was something Seven did quite well with those updates that would come up. Overall I preferred Seven’s but Nine isn’t far off. I could do without the McEnroe/Woodbridge pairing though, boring as hell.


#755

Tonight’s coverage is going to rate its tsits off…


Sunday 20 January 2019
#756

9now no longer have the different courts to view its just whats on the main channel


#757

Could that be because that’s the only match being played? Maybe check back tomorrow to see if the other streams are back.


#758

its been the case all day