Network Ten Pty Ltd


#1846

Back to ONE we go? :stuck_out_tongue_winking_eye:


#1847

10 PowerfulIndividual


#1848

Isn’t it a bit too late? 10 used the name before the merger. Wouldn’t Fairfax needed to have extended the boundaries of the trademark?


#1849

From a few posts back:


#1850

#1851

#1852

Ten Boss is now 10 Bold


#1853

Already here


#1854

#1855

Logo still doesn’t suit, but love the clapback tagline “it’s better to be bold than bossy”.

Surprised that press release is so openly vocal though.


#1856

I was too. Quite bold really to say it as it was!


#1857

So salty :rofl: not really a fan of the new name.


#1858

did they lose the court case baout the logo that was brought against them by the australian (?) i think


#1859

Australian Financial Review now owned by Nine. I guess they realised that Nine had a good case and they were likely to lose, so have given up to avoid expensive court costs.


#1860

Except Nine/Fairfax intend on proceeding to court apparently.
I hope they loose.


#1861

If they see that Ten has made the change, they might drop the case. May be they want a court ruling to prevent anyone else trying it on.

Even if Nine lose the case, Ten won’t be going back to the 10 BOSS name.


#1862

Despite Ten’s change, Nine could be still looking to recoup its legal costs


#1863

Not concerned about the boss brand to be honest I just think it’s an overly petty case.


#1864

10Go! and 10GEM would have been perfe… oh.

Never mind.