# Hit Network

**URL:** <https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/hit-network/71>\
**Category:** Major Metropolitan Radio\
**Tags:** sca\
**Created:** [December 28, 2015, 5:44am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/hit-network/71 "2015-12-28T05:44:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4572

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AustralianAerial](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/australianaerial/32/427176_2.png) [@AustralianAerial](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/AustralianAerial)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2021, 5:23am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/hit-network/71/4572 "2021-02-16T05:23:22Z")

</div>

or 2HC!

Yeah, I wouldn’t have either.

> [@NDY](#):
>
> I just don’t know whether reviving brands that are well & truly dead & buried is the solution.

Bingo. ARN learnt a lesson when they ran 96FM into the ground - you can’t rely upon heritage to get you through if you torch everything that’s remotely heritage about the station. The 96 product now is miles apart from 2014/15, not just in music but content. It owns its place in the market.

What would SCA have done with PMFM? Brought back Gary Shannon et. al.? Not at all - a generic logo and no other discerning links to the past.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/hit-network/71)._