# Future of radio

**URL:** <https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/future-of-radio/15300>\
**Category:** General Radio and Digital\
**Created:** [September 5, 2020, 1:40pm UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/future-of-radio/15300 "2020-09-05T13:40:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 96

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![captaincupcake](https://forums.mediaspy.org/user_avatar/forums.mediaspy.org/captaincupcake/32/455912_2.png) [@captaincupcake](https://forums.mediaspy.org/u/captaincupcake)\
**Post date:** [March 13, 2023, 12:31am UTC](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/future-of-radio/15300/96 "2023-03-13T00:31:07Z")

</div>

> [@Regional Radio (non-SCA)](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/regional-radio-non-sca/91/828):
>
> And if there is sufficient bandwidth, I imagine it would be more prone to buffering etc as well.

This conversation reminded me of this I saw the other week. While the article talks primarily about 5G advanced in the context of mobile calls, I would think this could also be a game changer for IP based audio streaming (given speeds would be well and truly sufficient to support it) in regional and remote areas.

> **[Next generation 5G will use satellites so you can make calls from literally...](https://eftm.com/2023/03/next-generation-5g-will-use-satellites-so-you-can-make-calls-from-literally-anywhere-in-australia-232286)**
>
> If you think that record speeds are the best thing to come from our jump to 5G then think again - in just a short year or so our mobile networks will

---

_[View the full topic](https://forums.mediaspy.org/t/future-of-radio/15300)._