“In complying with obligations under the constitution, negligence should never produce a more favourable result than diligence. The referrals presently before the court fall into the category of ignorance or wilful blindness.”
Absolutely right. There are things I don’t like about the Greens but on this they’re spot on.
PS: This suggestion is mind-boggling…
…Roberts has rubbished legal arguments by the Commonwealth that some of the politicians embroiled in the dual citizenship saga should be let off because they simply did not know they were foreigners.
So why hasn’t he resigned, then?
…Roberts’ lawyers now argue his, “case is stronger than those who profess ignorance and thus did nothing”.
What, so knowingly violating the highest law of the land is…better?
I’m no lawyer, but I remember some basics, and the idea of criminal intent makes me suspect the opposite may be the more predominant legal view.
We have to wait until after full hearings 10 to 12 October, but at least it’s something other than the (seemingly) never ending marriage survey…
PPS: A comment piece from a former editor of The Canberra Times:
…Bad luck, bad judgment and bad management of the cards Turnbull has been dealt continue to dog him, but he seems strangely relaxed, apparently comfortably breaststroking rather than foundering…
(Sorry for the morbid thought:) Perhaps like someone who is calm & because he’s decided to go ahead and commit suicide? In this case resigned to his political fate?
One would think that Turnbull’s best chance of retrieving his political fortunes would be by doing something – anything – that earned him serious credit in the electorate. Alas, it all seems to be too risky, if only because he is now in a situation, as Abbott was two years ago, where his colleagues rather than the opposition hold him back. Turnbull’s colleagues, as much as the electorate, have lost faith in his judgment. There’s only so far he can go, and more of what he does now seems for show rather than substance…