AFL broadcast rights 2025-2031

I’ll say it a little louder so those at the back can hear…

The loophole that Free TV Australia (and Warburton in that article) wants closed does not preclude the overseas streamers from acquiring rights - it’s about extending the provisions of the anti-syphoning list so that FTA can’t be sidelined from the process.

As it stands, the AFL (or another sport that is on the list) could sell their whole package of rights to say Amazon Prime (other streamers are available) and directly exclude FTA from any deal.

Its pure-and-simple rent-seeking from the FTA networks and peak industry body

EDIT: It’s worth noting, from my reading of the rules, that you don’t need to be an overseas streamer to do this either. An Australian-based streamer could do exactly the same, the current list only applies to licenced broadcasters - you don’t need a broadcast licence to operate a streaming service in Australia (yet).

13 Likes

Another example of FTA refusing to be competitive and instead needing to be carried through every challenge.

This wouldn’t even disqualify P+ from going after the AFL would it? Since obviously P+ and 10 would be going in together, it’s no different to what 7/Foxtel already do?

2 Likes

No it won’t… 10 will also have the rights. I think your a tad confused?

2 Likes

A bit rich from channel 7 consideration they signed a cricket deal which sees them hold rights for the ODIs which allows Fox to bypass the anti siphoning list for their exclusive coverage.

21 Likes

Warburtons a dick and must be worried that they might get outbid. They’re pathetic enough to tie up with foxtel and sell off exclusivity.

Paramount owns 10 and could therefore tie up thee rights with free to air as well as subscription.

The article is overall nonsense and doesn’t actually make clear the current situation.

5 Likes

Fancy Warburton having the gall to complain about the likes of Paramount and Amazon bidding when they can’t even get their own streamer and relies on Fox which is also American-owned. If he really wanted the AFL exclusively then he should be working on a SVOD platform that’s viable and popular.

Clearly they’re still in bed with Fox.

4 Likes

If the anti-siphoning rules stay the way they are, couldn’t Foxtel eventually go streaming only, just so they can give up their licence, avoid the anti-siphoning rules and buy all the rights, maybe with some token Kayo Freebies (or equivalent) available to placate the sports governing bodies (assuming they survive that long).

Do we know if the “secret lunch” Nick Tabkoff in today’s The Australian talks of between Bob Bakish and Gil McLachlan is separate from the meeting Paramount Global had with the AFL a month or so ago in New York?

1 Like

The timing suggests it may have happened on the same trip

4 Likes

Eddie must have made the trip too to be in discussion with his first network

3 Likes

Simon Hill could be used like Brenton Speed calling ALM and AFL

1 Like

You serious? Why would he call AFL?

2 Likes

With the cost of AFL overinflated, would be good to have perhaps one match a week on another broadcaster to help Seven balance the cost.

Not the first time breaking off a timeslot has been talked about. They could sell it to 10/Paramount or Amazon. But I doubt it this time round. Would be a brave move by AFL.

Most likely is something similar to status quo.

7 had an option of offload a match to another broadcaster in the current rights deal but it was not exercised at all.

Due to cost cutting , this would be a likely option in the next rights deal

The problem with this is then the simulcast deals will need to go as 10/P+ won’t sign up for one time slot that is shared with Fox.

If the AFL want to extract top dollar they need to ditch the 7/fox simulcast nonsense.

3 Likes

That was Fox who had the rights to sell Saturday afternoons to a FTA broadcaster, not 7. They obviously didn’t do that though.

6 Likes

Agree. Simulcasting you’d think is unlikely. And that could also mean more ads during play, even on pay tv.

I think Thursday night football all year is a no brainer. As for the crowds I think that’s a broader issue than just Thursday night football.

2 Likes